When Israel is sharing bullshit ...
Israel, do you know that the "terroristic attack done by humans in Berlin", keeping innocent animals inside a fucking cylinder against their will, still GENERATED MORE DEATHS, compared to what happened at the festivals ... and this is just one of many "terroristic actions done by humans to animals no one is giving a shit.
Even all K deaths animals due to 🛢 disaster, that happened exactly IN ISRAEL TOO!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188 or similar things...
Meanwhile, your 1400 is still 1400 since weeks, even yesterday
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Just think about that ... since most people simply give a shit to what happens to animals ...
Would be time that ANIMALS GET MORE RESPECT! and not treat like shit and just perfect if you want to eat them ... or useful, once people understand that animals ARE CRUCIAL FOR OUR LIFE!
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/21
It's time to sentence all people doing crimes over crimes to animals or nature, since currently LAWS ARE JUST SHIT! This is not different like doing a terror attack to animals!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/188
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/288
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/1150
https://xn--r1a.website/EcocideTelegram
This even with Israel oil disaster
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188
or other Israel crimes against animals
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/191
Yes, people rape animals too!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/598
But at least in Switzerland they "should" get sentenced for porn with animals ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/117
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/116
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/115
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/447
Even all K deaths animals due to 🛢 disaster, that happened exactly IN ISRAEL TOO!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188 or similar things...
Meanwhile, your 1400 is still 1400 since weeks, even yesterday
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Just think about that ... since most people simply give a shit to what happens to animals ...
Would be time that ANIMALS GET MORE RESPECT! and not treat like shit and just perfect if you want to eat them ... or useful, once people understand that animals ARE CRUCIAL FOR OUR LIFE!
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/21
It's time to sentence all people doing crimes over crimes to animals or nature, since currently LAWS ARE JUST SHIT! This is not different like doing a terror attack to animals!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/188
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/288
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/1150
https://xn--r1a.website/EcocideTelegram
This even with Israel oil disaster
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188
or other Israel crimes against animals
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/191
Yes, people rape animals too!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/598
But at least in Switzerland they "should" get sentenced for porn with animals ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/117
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/116
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/115
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/447
Genocide and Suicide Terrorism - Part 1
Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing:
Elements
1. The perpetrator killed2 one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
On 3 April 2002, about 1,000 Israeli troops entered the Jenin refugee camp on the West Bank, home to some 14,000 Palestinians. Supported by Apache attack helicopters and Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozers, the troops razed a section of the camp that harbored militants who had recently organized a string of devastating suicide missions and other attacks against Israeli civilians. At least 52 Palestinians were killed in Jenin, 22 of them civilians, along with 23 Israeli soldiers. By the time the dust settled on 11 April, more than a quarter of the camp’s residents were homeless.
Data were also collected on all 210 state-directed assassinations and 138 suicide bombings that took place in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza between 26 October 2000 (the date of the Second Intifada’s first suicide bombing) and 12 July 2005.
Note that although relatively indiscriminate state violence was more widespread in Gaza than in the West Bank, Israelis saw Gaza as less of a threat than the West Bank throughout the Second Intifada. That is because 109 suicide bombings originated in the West Bank compared to just 28 in Gaza (see Table 3).
Part 2 next post
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing:
Elements
1. The perpetrator killed2 one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
On 3 April 2002, about 1,000 Israeli troops entered the Jenin refugee camp on the West Bank, home to some 14,000 Palestinians. Supported by Apache attack helicopters and Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozers, the troops razed a section of the camp that harbored militants who had recently organized a string of devastating suicide missions and other attacks against Israeli civilians. At least 52 Palestinians were killed in Jenin, 22 of them civilians, along with 23 Israeli soldiers. By the time the dust settled on 11 April, more than a quarter of the camp’s residents were homeless.
Data were also collected on all 210 state-directed assassinations and 138 suicide bombings that took place in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza between 26 October 2000 (the date of the Second Intifada’s first suicide bombing) and 12 July 2005.
Note that although relatively indiscriminate state violence was more widespread in Gaza than in the West Bank, Israelis saw Gaza as less of a threat than the West Bank throughout the Second Intifada. That is because 109 suicide bombings originated in the West Bank compared to just 28 in Gaza (see Table 3).
Part 2 next post
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Genocide and Suicide Terrorism - Part 2
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/945
In Gaza, after the separation barrier was completed and the Second Intifada had begun, most militants were in fact compelled to turn away from suicide bombing and toward guerilla attacks and the launching of Qassam rockets and mortar shells at Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and Israel proper.
No such launches were recorded in 2000, but 516 took place in 2001. Their number rose steadily for the next three years to 1,475 in 2004 and then tapered off somewhat to just over 1,000 in 2005 (Intelligence and Information Center 2006, 24; Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2007).
In the West Bank, the situation was different. The rate of killing of Palestinians by Israel was only about half as high as in Gaza. At the same time, the frequency of Palestinian deaths was more sensitive to the threat level than was the case in Gaza. The correlation between the monthly number of Palestinian deaths and the monthly number of suicide missions originating in the region was strong and in the direction that Marshall’s rational choice theory would lead one to expect.
Thus, when threat was high in the West Bank, the killing of Palestinians by the Israeli state rose. When threat was low, the killing of Palestinians dropped off.
Interestingly, frontier-like Gaza was less subject to assassinations than was the West Bank. Nearly twice as many assassinations took place in the West Bank (135) as in Gaza (72).
In addition, a chorus of human rights groups, media outlets, the United Nations, and European governments soon criticized Israeli state violence, calling for constraint and reminding Israel that state violence against civilians violates international human rights norms that have become deeply entrenched since World War II.
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/945
In Gaza, after the separation barrier was completed and the Second Intifada had begun, most militants were in fact compelled to turn away from suicide bombing and toward guerilla attacks and the launching of Qassam rockets and mortar shells at Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and Israel proper.
No such launches were recorded in 2000, but 516 took place in 2001. Their number rose steadily for the next three years to 1,475 in 2004 and then tapered off somewhat to just over 1,000 in 2005 (Intelligence and Information Center 2006, 24; Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2007).
In the West Bank, the situation was different. The rate of killing of Palestinians by Israel was only about half as high as in Gaza. At the same time, the frequency of Palestinian deaths was more sensitive to the threat level than was the case in Gaza. The correlation between the monthly number of Palestinian deaths and the monthly number of suicide missions originating in the region was strong and in the direction that Marshall’s rational choice theory would lead one to expect.
Thus, when threat was high in the West Bank, the killing of Palestinians by the Israeli state rose. When threat was low, the killing of Palestinians dropped off.
Interestingly, frontier-like Gaza was less subject to assassinations than was the West Bank. Nearly twice as many assassinations took place in the West Bank (135) as in Gaza (72).
In addition, a chorus of human rights groups, media outlets, the United Nations, and European governments soon criticized Israeli state violence, calling for constraint and reminding Israel that state violence against civilians violates international human rights norms that have become deeply entrenched since World War II.
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 1
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information – even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to “seeing what we believe” (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information – even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to “seeing what we believe” (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 2
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/952
The human mind is a social mind, and we live in a community of knowledge in which we depend upon one another to think effectively to support complex and productive action (Sloman and Fernbach, 2018).
The human mind is a social mind that is embedded in social, cultural, and ecological contexts, and as such is wired to act in accordance, rather than in con ict, with social cues and values in one's environ (Schill et al., 2019).
Recent research in social network analysis has found that while novel ideas that are disseminated across large, unstructured networks (e.g. Twitter) may spread more quickly, such information ows rarely result in widespread behavior change (Centola, 2021). Rather, this research suggests that change starts and spreads in the peripheries of societies, where new ideas take hold among smaller social networks by means of strong social ties, which then connect to other social networks, and then eventually they are adopted by the centers (Centola, 2018, 2021).
In this sense, social networks are key both for openness to change as well as resistance to it.
———
Have we said some bullshit? No problem, you can tell us, for example in the comment, and we have no problem to recheck that and in case say "we said bullshit" ... since we don't believe anything, even things said by scientists, and maybe such scientists said bullshit ...
We have not checked every single sources cited, like we did with a nutrition paper
https://xn--r1a.website/GenRevolutionOfficial/182
It's not the scope! Like said, we NEVER visited Israel / Palestine too ...
We have no problem to say that.
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/713
This instead is not be done be most people ... that prefer to defend bullshit, even if they discover it's a bullshit.
Best example? We discovered only after a while this video is bullshit https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelTelegramChannels/10 but we have no problem to say we did an error
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/87
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/952
The human mind is a social mind, and we live in a community of knowledge in which we depend upon one another to think effectively to support complex and productive action (Sloman and Fernbach, 2018).
The human mind is a social mind that is embedded in social, cultural, and ecological contexts, and as such is wired to act in accordance, rather than in con ict, with social cues and values in one's environ (Schill et al., 2019).
Recent research in social network analysis has found that while novel ideas that are disseminated across large, unstructured networks (e.g. Twitter) may spread more quickly, such information ows rarely result in widespread behavior change (Centola, 2021). Rather, this research suggests that change starts and spreads in the peripheries of societies, where new ideas take hold among smaller social networks by means of strong social ties, which then connect to other social networks, and then eventually they are adopted by the centers (Centola, 2018, 2021).
In this sense, social networks are key both for openness to change as well as resistance to it.
———
Have we said some bullshit? No problem, you can tell us, for example in the comment, and we have no problem to recheck that and in case say "we said bullshit" ... since we don't believe anything, even things said by scientists, and maybe such scientists said bullshit ...
We have not checked every single sources cited, like we did with a nutrition paper
https://xn--r1a.website/GenRevolutionOfficial/182
It's not the scope! Like said, we NEVER visited Israel / Palestine too ...
We have no problem to say that.
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/713
This instead is not be done be most people ... that prefer to defend bullshit, even if they discover it's a bullshit.
Best example? We discovered only after a while this video is bullshit https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelTelegramChannels/10 but we have no problem to say we did an error
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/87
We noticed it just now ... This DUDE THAT JUST SHARE BULLSHIT OVER BULLSHIT
Recently https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/929
Previous
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/292
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/293
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/284
and other things ...
Ridiculous how Twitter still keep online accounts that PROMOTE JUST BULLSHIT! Few things should be done a) reduce visibility b) they should NOT get any type of money from any post they post! c) ban, if needed
But you know, when money is more important, so for Elon Musk is better to spread bullshit, so he can continue to get more rich and pollute our planet
Recently https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/929
Previous
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/292
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/293
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/284
and other things ...
Ridiculous how Twitter still keep online accounts that PROMOTE JUST BULLSHIT! Few things should be done a) reduce visibility b) they should NOT get any type of money from any post they post! c) ban, if needed
But you know, when money is more important, so for Elon Musk is better to spread bullshit, so he can continue to get more rich and pollute our planet
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Well even if this video is real and not bullshit
IDF: ‘Technical error’ caused Iron Dome to malfunction during flare-up with Gaza https://perma.cc/5A8S-HF2F
The IAF said in its investigation that the Iron Dome interception rate of rockets heading for populated areas amid the daylong flare-up was 90.5 percent. Last year, the IDF boasted of a 97% interception rate by Iron Dome.
According to the military, over 100 projectiles — including rockets, mortars, and shoulder-launched missiles fired at Israeli aircraft — were launched from Gaza during the fighting that began Tuesday morning and ended Wednesday morning.
The Iron Dome intercepted 24 of the projectiles. Another 48 projectiles landed in open areas in southern Israel, 14 fell short in Gaza, 11 landed in the sea, and another seven had unknown impact sites, the IDF said.
Police said officers dealt with at least five rocket impact sites in urban areas, some of which landed close to homes.
The Iron Dome has seen similar malfunctions in the past. In May 2021, a technical issue with an Iron Dome battery during a massive rocket barrage toward the coastal city of Ashkelon prevented some rockets from being intercepted and may have been responsible for the deaths of two women and the injury of dozens of people.
Remember that errors can happen! This in both sides, 🇵🇸 and 🇮🇱
Remember that 10k got launched!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Meanwhile seems almost just arabic medias report this news ... even if we search "malfunction / malfunctions" we get just such arabic posts and "🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇦 - Russian sources say the Odessa explosion was due to a malfunction in the Ukrainian air defense system"
IDF: ‘Technical error’ caused Iron Dome to malfunction during flare-up with Gaza https://perma.cc/5A8S-HF2F
The IAF said in its investigation that the Iron Dome interception rate of rockets heading for populated areas amid the daylong flare-up was 90.5 percent. Last year, the IDF boasted of a 97% interception rate by Iron Dome.
According to the military, over 100 projectiles — including rockets, mortars, and shoulder-launched missiles fired at Israeli aircraft — were launched from Gaza during the fighting that began Tuesday morning and ended Wednesday morning.
The Iron Dome intercepted 24 of the projectiles. Another 48 projectiles landed in open areas in southern Israel, 14 fell short in Gaza, 11 landed in the sea, and another seven had unknown impact sites, the IDF said.
Police said officers dealt with at least five rocket impact sites in urban areas, some of which landed close to homes.
The Iron Dome has seen similar malfunctions in the past. In May 2021, a technical issue with an Iron Dome battery during a massive rocket barrage toward the coastal city of Ashkelon prevented some rockets from being intercepted and may have been responsible for the deaths of two women and the injury of dozens of people.
Remember that errors can happen! This in both sides, 🇵🇸 and 🇮🇱
Remember that 10k got launched!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Meanwhile seems almost just arabic medias report this news ... even if we search "malfunction / malfunctions" we get just such arabic posts and "🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇦 - Russian sources say the Odessa explosion was due to a malfunction in the Ukrainian air defense system"
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Let we check Iron Dome more in details
The IDF says that since the beginning of the war, some 9,500 rockets and mortars, as well as dozens of drones, have been fired at Israel, mostly from the Gaza Strip https://perma.cc/8N2K-QCWG
Some 900 rockets were launched from within civilian sites, including mosques, schools, hospitals and cultural centers. Around 12% of the rockets fell short inside the Gaza Strip, according to the IDF data.
Some 2,000 projectiles have been intercepted by the IDF’s air defense systems — the short-range Iron Dome, medium-range David’s Sling and Patriot, and long-range Arrow.
Many rockets landed in open areas, while some hit civilian sites, causing casualties. The IDF does not provide an interception rate, but the Iron Dome has previously been reported to have an estimated 95% success rate of downing rockets heading for populated areas.
During the first four hours of Hamas’s shock onslaught on southern Israel on October 7, some 3,000 rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip at Israel, according to the IDF data. For comparison, during the entire 2014 Gaza War, which lasted 50 days, some 4,000 rockets were fired in total.
An air defense system consists of three key components. First, there are radars to detect, identify and track incoming missiles. The range of these radars varies. Iron Dome’s radar is effective over distances of 2.5 to 43.5 miles (4 to 70 km), according to its manufacturer Raytheon. Once an object has been detected by the radar, it must be assessed to determine whether it is a threat. Information such as direction and speed are used to make this determination https://perma.cc/R99C-VRGJ
Israel has at least 10 Iron Dome batteries in operation, each containing 60 to 80 interceptor missiles. Each of those missiles costs about US$60,000. In previous attacks involving smaller numbers of missiles and rockets, Iron Dome was 90% effective against a range of threats.
It is a simple question of numbers.
More
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/361
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/949
The IDF says that since the beginning of the war, some 9,500 rockets and mortars, as well as dozens of drones, have been fired at Israel, mostly from the Gaza Strip https://perma.cc/8N2K-QCWG
Some 900 rockets were launched from within civilian sites, including mosques, schools, hospitals and cultural centers. Around 12% of the rockets fell short inside the Gaza Strip, according to the IDF data.
Some 2,000 projectiles have been intercepted by the IDF’s air defense systems — the short-range Iron Dome, medium-range David’s Sling and Patriot, and long-range Arrow.
Many rockets landed in open areas, while some hit civilian sites, causing casualties. The IDF does not provide an interception rate, but the Iron Dome has previously been reported to have an estimated 95% success rate of downing rockets heading for populated areas.
During the first four hours of Hamas’s shock onslaught on southern Israel on October 7, some 3,000 rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip at Israel, according to the IDF data. For comparison, during the entire 2014 Gaza War, which lasted 50 days, some 4,000 rockets were fired in total.
An air defense system consists of three key components. First, there are radars to detect, identify and track incoming missiles. The range of these radars varies. Iron Dome’s radar is effective over distances of 2.5 to 43.5 miles (4 to 70 km), according to its manufacturer Raytheon. Once an object has been detected by the radar, it must be assessed to determine whether it is a threat. Information such as direction and speed are used to make this determination https://perma.cc/R99C-VRGJ
Israel has at least 10 Iron Dome batteries in operation, each containing 60 to 80 interceptor missiles. Each of those missiles costs about US$60,000. In previous attacks involving smaller numbers of missiles and rockets, Iron Dome was 90% effective against a range of threats.
It is a simple question of numbers.
More
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/361
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/949
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Just remember one thing: even such videos are a manipulation ...
Not just because 10k or 20k or 100k people are going to the street, means the whole city is with such country. Is the same like voting, not all people vote. Means there could be a 50.1% vs 49.9%, this doesn't mean people agree with that!
Same happens with social networks, where most smart users don't waste time to comment, like or add useless emoji.
Another point that is interesting, now seems that everyone is trying to defend rights, when the reality is that they give a shit until now and will give a shit once they get bored about this war, which will happen in few months and already started weeks ago. Currently 90% of the people got bored about such story and day by day people are not interested anymore ...
This is how people acts. They give a shit ... without understand that this situation is not just related to Israel and Palestine, since in all countries shitty laws still exist, even in Italy ...
Napoli è con il popolo palestinese. Invece di protestare, dovresti anche investire tempo per leggere fatti ... @PalestineInnocent @StandForWar
Ma visto che nessuno caga i fatti, l'ignoranza continua a girare ...
Un ultimo punto, di che nazione sei? Perchè se sei palestinese e dici Napoli è con il popolo palestinese, ricordiamo che NON sei italiana di origine, anche se sei nata a Napoli ...
Cmq hanno il diritto di protestare. Non cambia il fatto che ENTRAMBI SON SPORCHI, esattamente come l'Ucraina è sporca, nonostante la Russia ha attaccato ...
Not just because 10k or 20k or 100k people are going to the street, means the whole city is with such country. Is the same like voting, not all people vote. Means there could be a 50.1% vs 49.9%, this doesn't mean people agree with that!
Same happens with social networks, where most smart users don't waste time to comment, like or add useless emoji.
Another point that is interesting, now seems that everyone is trying to defend rights, when the reality is that they give a shit until now and will give a shit once they get bored about this war, which will happen in few months and already started weeks ago. Currently 90% of the people got bored about such story and day by day people are not interested anymore ...
This is how people acts. They give a shit ... without understand that this situation is not just related to Israel and Palestine, since in all countries shitty laws still exist, even in Italy ...
Napoli è con il popolo palestinese. Invece di protestare, dovresti anche investire tempo per leggere fatti ... @PalestineInnocent @StandForWar
Ma visto che nessuno caga i fatti, l'ignoranza continua a girare ...
Un ultimo punto, di che nazione sei? Perchè se sei palestinese e dici Napoli è con il popolo palestinese, ricordiamo che NON sei italiana di origine, anche se sei nata a Napoli ...
Cmq hanno il diritto di protestare. Non cambia il fatto che ENTRAMBI SON SPORCHI, esattamente come l'Ucraina è sporca, nonostante la Russia ha attaccato ...
Sorry Huffpost, what you said? Scarsa moderazione di X e Telegram, e poi VOI siete i primi! 🤦♂️ Please tell less bullshit, if YOU are the first one sharing video of Hamas!
Almeno Wired usa il cervello ...
Non tutti i follower acquisiti dalle Brigate al-Qassam sono sostenitori della causa. Tra questi, infatti, molti sono giornalisti, reporter, ricercatori ed esperti di sicurezza che hanno bisogno di rimanere aggiornati sulle azioni dell'organizzazione in tempo reale, e che trovano in Telegram una buona soluzione per renderlo possibile.
Tous les partisans acquis par les Brigades al-Qassam ne soutiennent pas cette cause. Parmi ceux-ci, en effet, nombreux sont les journalistes, reporters, chercheurs et experts en sécurité qui ont besoin de rester informés des actions de l'organisation en temps réel et qui trouvent dans Telegram une bonne solution pour rendre cela possible.
No todos los seguidores adquiridos por las Brigadas al-Qassam apoyan la causa. Entre ellos, de hecho, muchos son periodistas, reporteros, investigadores y expertos en seguridad que necesitan estar actualizados sobre las acciones de la organización en tiempo real y que encuentran en Telegram una buena solución para hacerlo posible.
Not all followers acquired by the al-Qassam Brigades are supporters of the cause. Among these, in fact, many are journalists, reporters, researchers and security experts who need to stay updated on the organization's actions in real time, and who find Telegram a good solution to make this possible.
Almeno Wired usa il cervello ...
Non tutti i follower acquisiti dalle Brigate al-Qassam sono sostenitori della causa. Tra questi, infatti, molti sono giornalisti, reporter, ricercatori ed esperti di sicurezza che hanno bisogno di rimanere aggiornati sulle azioni dell'organizzazione in tempo reale, e che trovano in Telegram una buona soluzione per renderlo possibile.
Tous les partisans acquis par les Brigades al-Qassam ne soutiennent pas cette cause. Parmi ceux-ci, en effet, nombreux sont les journalistes, reporters, chercheurs et experts en sécurité qui ont besoin de rester informés des actions de l'organisation en temps réel et qui trouvent dans Telegram une bonne solution pour rendre cela possible.
No todos los seguidores adquiridos por las Brigadas al-Qassam apoyan la causa. Entre ellos, de hecho, muchos son periodistas, reporteros, investigadores y expertos en seguridad que necesitan estar actualizados sobre las acciones de la organización en tiempo real y que encuentran en Telegram una buena solución para hacerlo posible.
Not all followers acquired by the al-Qassam Brigades are supporters of the cause. Among these, in fact, many are journalists, reporters, researchers and security experts who need to stay updated on the organization's actions in real time, and who find Telegram a good solution to make this possible.