Parliament to debate "Do Not Introduce Digital ID" Petition on December 8th... I’ll be waiting with bated breath for this latest performance of fake democracy.

The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (signed up to by 193 member states in 2015) runs on digital ID; it’s the bloodstream of the whole machine. And yet some people genuinely believe one tiny island’s government theatre is about to smash the global control grid.

We have to stop looking to MPs, Westminster, or whatever shiny new party rolls onto the stage for salvation. They’re not running the show; they are the show - the distraction, the costume, the script.

If there’s any pushback, it won’t come from them. Only the people can break this, and if we don’t, no one will.

Because to the globalists, we’re expendable consumers - “useless eaters” - destined, if they get their way, to be equally poor and equally controlled.

@FionaRoseDiamond

‼️SATURDAY 15TH NOV‼️

🇬🇧Liverpool
⏰️12 PM
📍Church St/Lord St

📣Community Outreach, Speakers, Protest! We inform, educate, empower and say NO to digital ID!


Merseyside Residents Association
MassNonCompliance.com
British Lions For Freedom

I concur

I didn’t know if we’d see it happen. But…

The Agenda: Their Vision - Your Future has ticked past 1 million views on YouTube.

It's been translated into more than 13 languages. It’s been viewed directly over a half a million times on X from this account alone. It’s been uniquely downloaded over 8,000 times from the website and mirrored all over the internet. I also know that it has been distributed via physical screenings and bootleg hard copy. I think it’s safe to say that collectively it has now been seen millions of times.

I’d like to take the opportunity to say thank you to everybody that has helped promote and share this film and get it out to the world. This has been a wholly grassroots effort and its distribution has only been made possible with your support.

We made the film available for free because of the nature of the information covered but if you’d like to donate and help us recoup some of our substantial production costs, you can do so via the website.

I feel a need to thank the participants for their trust and their significant contributions. Many have never met one another or even interacted and I’m sure would not necessarily agree on every issue. Your trust to come together in collaboration with Mark Sharman and myself in order to put together the most impactful end result possible truly means a lot.

As for whether the film’s days on YouTube are numbered, I’m not sure.

Mark and I previously collaborated on the film Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion, which was censored from YouTube with 991,178 views, albeit shortly after it was mentioned in parliament.

YouTube appears to have changed course on this front, recently vowing to “protect free expression” by pulling back on content moderation (censorship).

Nevertheless, I’m a firm believer that how you behaved during the Covid era is exactly who you are. Crises, real or manufactured, have that effect on people and organisations. And such a strategic pivot could just as easily be reversed overnight.

Not to mention an algorithmic “dialling down” of visibility by way of search exclusion, reduced reach and general shadowbanning is likely the freshly favoured approach for dealing with inconvenient information. It’s quieter and comes with plausible deniability baked in.

So will The Agenda stay on YouTube? Time will tell I suppose.

But for now, it’s still there. Over 1 million views and counting.

‼️Today at 2:30‼️

Home Affairs Committee on Digital ID.

Firstly, I’ll make clear that my firm belief is that Westminster and MPs are not in control or "running the show" - they ARE the show!

They're simply doing the globalists bidding.

However; please tune in if you can, demonstrate the sentiment of the UK and comment as much as possible!

This has been kept fairly quiet (I only learned of it last night) but it's worth showing them exactly how we feel...

"The Home Affairs Committee explores the potential benefits and risks of digital ID.

This session has a particular focus on the potential benefits for managing the immigration system and reducing crime.

Discussion will also include what challenges need to be overcome to deliver an efficient and effective digital ID system, as well as the potential negative impact of mandatory ID systems."

https://www.youtube.com/live/BF1Ucg9ggYo

@FionaRoseDiamond

👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼

Comments are turned OFF!

Fuckers.

Make no mistake: they'll keep a trail - and they won't hesitate to use it.

They give the game away every time. In today’s Home Affairs Committee you could hear the same well-rehearsed line: your purchase information will be stored. Despite their feigned assurances that “it doesn’t have to work that way,” they talk as if the whole system is still some vague work-in-progress.

Buy a little too much wine? They’re already hinting that this data could be passed to the NHS “for your own good.” It’s absurd - pure political theatre.

The reality is that the infrastructure is already in place. Data will be shared; a full, centralised log of everything you do through this ID system will form a single canonical record - not just for right-to-rent or right-to-work checks, but for everything.

They pretend they haven’t figured out how the system will operate, but that’s part of the performance. They know exactly how it will function. There will be an audit trail. They will track your transactions. And, as critics warn, they could eventually tie all of this to programmable, blockchain-based central bank digital currency - enabling behavioural restrictions and building a comprehensive, permanent record of your activity.

We MUST reject Digital ID. We are sending a clear, uncompromising message on 13th December in London... and the world will be watching. 1pm. Location TBA. Follow here for announcements.

@FionaRoseDiamond

"Giving evidence" in today's Home Affairs Committee meeting on Digital ID, was Laura Foster.

Laura is an Associate Director of Tech UK...

See below from Clare Wills Harrison 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼

techUK were involved with the track and trace stuff during Convid. Not as a direct developer, contractor, or operator of the system or app but as a trade association "advocate and facilitator", leveraging their position to connect member companies with government opportunities, provide policy input, and promote tech sector "solutions" for "pandemic responses". They were basically a "whisperer" to GDS (and still are) where they amplified industry voices on issues like self-isolation exemptions, data access, and digital tools. Their involvement was prominent in 2020–2021, amid the £37 billion program (one of the UK's most expensive health initiatives, per a 2021 Public Accounts Committee report), but it drew criticism for perceived conflicts, as members like Accenture and others benefited from related contracts

TechUK's engagement stemmed from their Central Government Programme, which positioned them as a bridge for tech firms. They didn't receive direct funding for track and trace (no grants or contracts listed on Contracts Finder), but their advocacy helped members secure adjacent work in testing, data analytics, and app support.

1 TechUK actively lobbied to embed tech solutions into the track and trace ecosystem, emphasising "critical infrastructure" exemptions to keep digital services running.
In July 2021, techUK urged the government to allow "test and release" schemes for datacentre staff pinged by the app, arguing it would prevent disruptions to national infrastructure (e.g., cloud services powering tracing). They proposed operators run their own negative-test protocols to speed returns to work

Through their "COVID" Information Hub (launched April 2020), techUK highlighted how member data tools could aid tracing. E.g. Elsevier (member) shared insights on data's role in outbreak modelling, while Doctorlink (NHS symptom checker) integrated with tracing workflows. techUK's hub featured 50+ case studies, positioning members for pilots. These efforts fit the pattern of industry shaping policy for member gain, as the £7 billion Winter Plan (Nov 2020) boosted tech procurement

2. TechUK didn't build the test and trace app, but they connected members to NHSX collaborations. Member spotlights via techUK showcased how members "contributed". Accenture (techUK board member) provided product management, design, and development for the app's initial build. Valtech (member) developed the NHS text-messaging service for result notifications and contact alerts, integrating with the app

TechUK also co-hosted NHSX briefings (e.g., June 2020 on app trials)

This "route to market" funneled firms into £195–300 million in 2021 consultancy spends (mostly to top suppliers like Deloitte, another member). The app's development was chaotic—halted in June 2020 due to Bluetooth issues and privacy concerns (e.g., ICO warnings on data flows)—but techUK framed it positively in reports, urging "urgent action" while downplaying risks

3. TechUK's hub (active 2020–2022) was a clearinghouse for 100+ resources, including tracing-adjacent tools such as "symptom checkers". They also conducted remote monitoring pilots with Facebook/Samsung for at-risk notifications, tying into app alerts. Further, they submitted evidence to parliamentary inquiries (e.g., 2020 Health Committee on tracing efficacy), advocating localised tech

TechUK's role amplified the "profiteering" during Convid. While they claimed to champion "innovation for public good," members scooped £multi-million contracts amid the £37 billion spend. Privacy groups sued over data handling in NHSTT/Palantir ties, echoing concerns about Big Tech influence. A 2021 BMJ report slammed NHSTT as a "failure" despite the budget, with MPs probing consultant overuse (£1,100/day averages). TechUK wasn't directly implicated, but their facilitation greased the wheels—much like their GDS ties today

In short techUK are heavily invested in this agenda due to their multi million company members. They are enablers and cheerleaders, bolstered by their whisperer credentials, paving the way digital ID advocacy

Laura Foster, who was on the panel despite looking about 12, is a senior director for technology and innovation with techUK, after having a rather outstandingly quick rise to the top

I will cover all of this in more detail tomorrow on my Substack

UK GOV Wallet is already here. The BritCard would have just been another token in that wallet.

It must be understood that the BritCard (or whatever name they choose to give it) is merely a single credential or “token” to be hosted on the wallet. When I encourage people to reject Digital ID, I am referring to the much wider, integrated system of tokens; I’m not just talking about the one token that checks your age or your right to work or rent. I’m talking about the wallet that will hold every token, the system that will become the digital container for your whole life.

The UK government’s digital identity infrastructure is already in place. The GOV UK One Login system has been live since 2021, is being rolled out as the single sign-in and identity-check service and it functions as a de facto digital ID. Government services (for example Companies House) now require directors of limited companies to verify their identity digitally via One Login.

This will expand across many services: One Login is already the route for identity verification for state interactions. We know, however, that the digital ID agenda will cross borders between the public sector and private bodies.

But to understand where we’re going, we need to understand what’s already in place. The infrastructure is already there: One Login is the base, and the GOV UK Wallet app is the layer that will host various tokens – digitised credentials about you.

For example: a veterans card is one such token; likewise a digital driving licence; and the so-called BritCard (which was proposed as a credential used to prove right-to-rent, right-to-work, age in a pub etc). More tokens will be added to this wallet so no matter what name is given, the GOV UK Wallet will become essentially your digital twin, hosting numerous credentials and tokens about you in digital form.

To use the wallet you must have a One Login account (i.e., your identity must be verified via One Login). The scope will be expanded and more people will be signed up to One Login through coercion and exclusion. It's already happened with Companies House. Sign up or lose your business.

The wallet itself is the “app of apps” – the all-encompassing digital ID.

As life becomes increasingly tokenised, the wallet will accumulate more and more digital credentials. The government has already stated that the digital ID system will be used for things like benefits, taxes, pensions, and to access your own money. In the very near future, more functions will be routed through the same digital wallet infrastructure.

Layer onto that programmable central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and you start to see how dystopian the direction of travel is. Eventually, add loyalty cards, travel passes, flight tickets and other private-sector credentials into the same wallet, creating a consolidated picture of habits, preferences, and purchases.

From here, the dystopian nightmare takes over. In an “emergency” – say, another “pandemic” – a fully integrated digital ID/wallet system will be used to limit access, restrict movement, or shape behaviour. Carbon-credit counting, social-behaviour scoring and compliance checks, and you get the kind of system people warn about when they talk about “digital control”.

But all of this sits on top of a much deeper iceberg. That’s why understanding the basics matters. To talk about the bigger picture – and especially about who is shaping it – you first need a clear view of the basics and then, knowing and exposing “the architects” of this system – know thine enemy and know their plan.

The shadowy globalists and NGOs have been long planning this with – in 2015 – 193 countries signing up via the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development – they have sold us out for power and profit and intend to fully control and monitor every aspect of our lives the moment we wake up.

Be ready for what’s coming but know what you’re fighting in order to win.

@FionaRoseDiamond

Globalist architects are designing our future. To fight and win, we must understand the battle. Digital ID is the foundation of a global system of control. We pull back the curtain on the hidden hands shaping it.

📛Mass Non-Compliance Protest Against Digital ID: NEXT LEVEL! AMPLIFIED!

🗓13th December, 1 PM, Central London. Location to be announced.

📣We are sending a clear, uncompromising message on 13th December in London... and the world will be watching!

🚨Our purpose is simple: We pull back the curtain. We expose. We educate. We empower. We win. We will also be livestreaming around the world!

🙏🏻If you can, please donate for placards, thousands of leaflets, 46 sqm mobile LED screen and stage, and other equipment. Every donation will be used to amplify our collective message. All invoices are published on the website.

🙋🏻‍♀️As the organiser, I am fundraising to achieve our purpose. The fundraiser is live here buymeacoffee.com/FionaRoseDiamond

🌟It’s an honour to be joining forces with Ickonic who are helping amplify this protest so it reaches people across the world! Thank you Jaymie and team.

@FionaRoseDiamond

Here's the Substack video updating and discussing one Log in and Gov Wallet. I did it live on Substack and it looks like it worked so no adult tantrum incoming

I hope this helps explain how these systems work and also why we need to be concerned about more than just Britcard, which is just one of many possible tokens for the wallet

I also talk about vouching in this video - what it is and how it will likely work

Remember, as this is a video you need to click on the link to watch and not on the instant view

https://clarewillsharrison.substack.com/p/one-login-acsp-for-directors-and