Wir wollen keine "Die Welle" mehr! We don't want that people act irrationally like sheeps
85 subscribers
12 photos
67 videos
68 links
For a better world without "die Welle", where people act rationally by questioning everything - A project by @RoadToPetabyte @GenRevolutionOfficial @CountriesFreaks - Other: @BullshitTelegramArticles @RedditBlackout @ClimateChangeTelegram ...
Download Telegram
Do you think that only "average people" act like sheeps? The reality is that even professional (not all!) are doing that, showed with for example the Iron - Spinach myth and now even with the "Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets", just about the topic "protein intake"

In summary: they used almost just books (which are not a scientific source for informations!), such pdf / books are citing studies published more than 20/30 years ago (all new studies get just ignored, except in part in the 🇨🇭swiss statement), where data is missing, specific groups where not analysed (especially elderly, male, kids or people with specific disease or needs ...) and no difference between countries has been made too. 2009 version has 2 citations (1 paper and 1 book, excluding this about sport ...), 2016 has 3 (the same book, the book of the author ... and a pdf with over 1000 pages). So not 100+ like dietitians and vegans are saying. Without considering the citation in citation, topic we analyzed and verified too. Even if studies said for example 40% of the the people don't get enough protein, they simply ignored that, because they just checked ø without considering the additional need of elderly, etc. too. Missing data studies or just about adult women got at the end considered as "facts for all people, no matter what". Without talking about low amount of people considered, the method to check the protein intake, etc.

Without considering that protein != protein and ø intake != all people in the world eat enough vegan protein. Quality of the protein is not the topic now, it's just about the protein intake and nothing has to do with pro vegan or no vegan, it's only checking facts with facts. If you are interested, you can find more @VeganNutritionTelegram

Again, stop acting like sheeps by commenting before reading or checking things, by citing old data ignoring new infos, by don't verify if what other are writing is bullshit or not, instead of believe that and citing using just the abstract ..
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚦🟥 is the WORST example to show sheep behaviour! Not only because someone is walking with red, means he is doing something wrong, especially IF NO CAR ARE THERE AT ALL! (but you first need to check that ...). Many people are using such example.

There are so many people waiting on🚦for 5 minutes, even if almost no car are there. "In such case we could say that those people are more sheeps waiting for nothing, compared to the other". They do that even on secondary roads. Plus you can cross the road 20 - 100 meters beforehand, without using the pedestrian crossing (and in such case 🚦), as long as there are no cars and this is not putting someone in dangerous. So before doing that always look 👀.

Conclusion: cars, etc. should follow🚦(since at the end the view point of the place is huge limited to🧍‍♂️and other factors). But using 🚦for people sheep behaviour is bullshit, even if this is true. Once the "black sheep" is doing that, the other who waited follow him ... (but this doesn't mean the black sheep is doing something wrong, if no cars are there ...)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Experimento Social: ¿Te dejarías llevar por la corriente? Influencia Social - Psicología Social

Experimento Social realizado en la Universidad Católica Andrés Bello para la materia de Psicología Social de 2do semestre de Comunicación Social donde estudiamos la Influencia Social en los pasillos de la universidad

Backup by @DieWelleTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is the sad reality of our planet. Most people just want to believe the shit they want to believe, even if you prove with facts the opposite. This researcher is saying that for climate change, but in reality this happens for all aspects of their lifes, from their social network usage, to nutrition, to their behaviour when disasters happen, to their social pression behaviour changes, to their shopping behaviour to ...

Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now).

Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too.

Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.
"Quando tutta Italia ti incolpa per una cosa privata, ma nessuno sa che sei stato trascinato dai tuoi amici".

Allora dovresti guardare @StopDieWelle e iniziare ad imparare sull'influenza sociale!

Not 1900, this happened in 2019!

The experimenters created 11 sexual harassment scenarios that described a workplace incident where a supervisor sexually harassed an employee.

Hypothesis 1a: at least 50% of the participants would conform at least once to the punishment selections offered by the confederates on the misinformation trials (example too hard)

Hypothesis 1b: participants would be more likely to conform to punishment selections that were harsh compared to lenient.

Hypothesis 2: The social influence of the confederates’ selections would significantly impact the responses of the participants, driving the average severity up (compared to the control participants) in the conditions where the confederates selected harsh punishments and driving the average severity down in the conditions where the confederates selected lenient punishments

Hypothesis 3: We also expected be less likely to provide correct punishment selections on the misinformation trials

Hypothesis 4: Participants who conformed to misinformation were predicted to experience a mismatch between their behavior and attitudes.

We found an overall conformity rate of 46%, as 82.67% conformed at least once to harsh or lenient punishment selections. Participants who conformed to incorrect punishment selections exhibited lower levels of decision confidence, indicating that conformity may have been due more to social normative influence. To summarize, we found support for all of our hypotheses!

This is how sex abuse is happening @StopDieWelle, because people act like sheeps! It's not an excuse to be a sheep! You need to be a black sheep like us.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember, what other do doesn't mean it's correct, no matter what.

YOU need to choice for you what is the best, using the brain and not social pressure!

Backup by @DieWelleTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
expérience de Asch version Française se conformer au groupe

Backup by @DieWelleTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🐑 would say "yes" (and they did that too), we "no", because we act with the 🧠

Backup by @DieWelleTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme