Complex Systems Studies
2.43K subscribers
1.55K photos
125 videos
116 files
4.54K links
What's up in Complexity Science?!
Check out here:

@ComplexSys

#complexity #complex_systems #networks #network_science

πŸ“¨ Contact us: @carimi
Download Telegram
Complex Systems Studies
Photo
Interested in Information processing in biological or social systems? Quantum information? Brain-inspired computing? Open Call for students with interest in obtaining a Ph.D. on these topics. Submissions until 21/9. More detailed information available in: https://t.co/LFxe2EgggI
πŸ“ Attack Tolerance of Link Prediction Algorithms: How to Hide Your Relations in a Social Network

Study of the ability to alter connections so as to increase the probability that some connections remain unidentified by link prediction algorithms.

🌐 https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00152

🎲 @ComplexSys
πŸ“ "Mathematical models of collective dynamics and self-organization" (by P. Degond):

"In this paper, we begin by reviewing a certain number of mathematical challenges posed by the modelling of collective dynamics and self-organization. Then..."

🌐 https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02808

🎲 @ComplexSys
This is how Google Translate is trained to be biased in gender neutral languages like Persian.
And this paper shows that the bias is even more than the real data!
https://t.co/2TVXLNTgqt
πŸŒ„ Are mountains fractal? Actually there are two scaling regimes (same on earth and venus!)
http://necsi.edu/research/multiscale/earth-venus

Smooth at fine scale, rough at large scales with an exponent satisfying the KPZ (Kardar Parisi Zhang) prediction 0.4.
πŸ“Turn off your e-mail and social media to get more done
Distractions are a fundamental aspect of the modern world, but we don’t have to become hermits to avoid them.

🌐 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06213-7

🎲 @ComplexSys
πŸ”– Triangulating War: Network Structure and the Democratic Peace

Benjamin Campbell, Skyler Cranmer, Bruce Desmarais

πŸ”— https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.04141

πŸ“Œ ABSTRACT
Decades of research has found that democratic dyads rarely exhibit violent tendencies, making the democratic peace arguably the principal finding of Peace Science. However, the democratic peace rests upon a dyadic understanding of conflict. Conflict rarely reflects a purely dyadic phenomena---even if a conflict is not multi-party, multiple states may be engaged in distinct disputes with the same enemy. We postulate a network theory of conflict that treats the democratic peace as a function of the competing interests of mixed-regime dyads and the strategic inefficiencies of fighting with enemies' enemies. Specifically, we find that a state's decision to engage in conflict with a target state is conditioned by the other states in which the target state is in conflict. When accounting for this network effect, we are unable to find support for the democratic peace. This suggests that the major finding of three decades worth of conflict research is spurious.
πŸ“Is together better? Examining scientific collaborations across multiple authors, institutions, and departments

🌐 https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04093

🎲 @ComplexSys