A SHAME FOR 🇷🇺 RUSSIA!
A country contributing to 💥 of our 🌍
WWF International statement on “undesirable” characterisation in Russia
https://perma.cc/K526-VWQB
Greenpeace: Environmental protection is ‘undesirable’ in Russia https://perma.cc/2LAU-7QK2
Perhaps more than any other Arctic country, Russia has much to gain from climate trends in the Arctic https://perma.cc/97ZY-4ZUC
Russia is a very poor performer (“F”) under the VACI, on par with Brazil and Iran. The country has a high animal slaughter rate, large consumption of animal products and inadequate legislative protection of farmed animals https://perma.cc/44UC-DWQ9
Roughly 20,000 reindeer have been poached in Russia since August 2016 https://perma.cc/23CG-N5ZV
30 Greenpeace activists charged with piracy in Russia https://perma.cc/8Y6N-BGRT
Arctic 30 jailed in Russia argue their case in European Court https://perma.cc/U2CD-C4W9
Us vs Them: Sadism and Animal Abuse in Russian Army https://perma.cc/4DUV-85CK
Russia’s forest sector has become deeply criminalized. https://perma.cc/27MJ-4RRR https://perma.cc/7CJT-CCYR
The Government of Russia is urged to formally recognise animals as sentient in legislation, given the scientific evidence which has proven that all vertebrates, cephalopods and decapod crustaceans are sentient. Furthermore, the Government of Russia is strongly encouraged to expand the scope of application of Federal Law No. 498-ФЗ to all animals. The Government of Russia is urged to ban the confinement of farm animals – for instance, in sow stalls and farrowing crates for pigs, and in cages for egg-laying hens – and the Government is urged to mandate the humane slaughter of all farm animals, with stunning prior to slaughter. The Government of Russia is furthermore urged to ban fur farming, which is inherently cruel, causing pain and distress to animals. The Government of Russia is urged to outlaw forms of entertainment which cause animal suffering, such as the use of captive marine mammals in shows for the public. https://perma.cc/S49G-
A country contributing to 💥 of our 🌍
WWF International statement on “undesirable” characterisation in Russia
https://perma.cc/K526-VWQB
Greenpeace: Environmental protection is ‘undesirable’ in Russia https://perma.cc/2LAU-7QK2
Perhaps more than any other Arctic country, Russia has much to gain from climate trends in the Arctic https://perma.cc/97ZY-4ZUC
Russia is a very poor performer (“F”) under the VACI, on par with Brazil and Iran. The country has a high animal slaughter rate, large consumption of animal products and inadequate legislative protection of farmed animals https://perma.cc/44UC-DWQ9
Roughly 20,000 reindeer have been poached in Russia since August 2016 https://perma.cc/23CG-N5ZV
30 Greenpeace activists charged with piracy in Russia https://perma.cc/8Y6N-BGRT
Arctic 30 jailed in Russia argue their case in European Court https://perma.cc/U2CD-C4W9
Us vs Them: Sadism and Animal Abuse in Russian Army https://perma.cc/4DUV-85CK
Russia’s forest sector has become deeply criminalized. https://perma.cc/27MJ-4RRR https://perma.cc/7CJT-CCYR
The Government of Russia is urged to formally recognise animals as sentient in legislation, given the scientific evidence which has proven that all vertebrates, cephalopods and decapod crustaceans are sentient. Furthermore, the Government of Russia is strongly encouraged to expand the scope of application of Federal Law No. 498-ФЗ to all animals. The Government of Russia is urged to ban the confinement of farm animals – for instance, in sow stalls and farrowing crates for pigs, and in cages for egg-laying hens – and the Government is urged to mandate the humane slaughter of all farm animals, with stunning prior to slaughter. The Government of Russia is furthermore urged to ban fur farming, which is inherently cruel, causing pain and distress to animals. The Government of Russia is urged to outlaw forms of entertainment which cause animal suffering, such as the use of captive marine mammals in shows for the public. https://perma.cc/S49G-
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dear Future Generations: Sorry
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Putin speech, in part correct, because the main issue of most people now is having such 0% of 100% approach by wanting a change in the next 24h! This is not realistic at all, BUT we don't need to use this as an excuse for doing nothing, by giving priority just to money and our daily habits (that we don't want to change)
Речь Путина отчасти правильная, потому что основная проблема большинства людей сейчас в том, чтобы иметь такой подход 0% из 100%, желая перемен в ближайшие 24 часа! Это совсем нереально, НО нам не нужно использовать это как оправдание бездействия, отдавая приоритет только деньгам и нашим повседневным привычкам (которые мы не хотим менять).
Речь Путина отчасти правильная, потому что основная проблема большинства людей сейчас в том, чтобы иметь такой подход 0% из 100%, желая перемен в ближайшие 24 часа! Это совсем нереально, НО нам не нужно использовать это как оправдание бездействия, отдавая приоритет только деньгам и нашим повседневным привычкам (которые мы не хотим менять).
It's time to stop taking excuses using bullshit facts. We in Switzerland, USA, Russia, etc. pollute too much. Based on EU data, China has a CO2 pro capita of 8.73, USA 14.24 So stop to check such things just based on % or total pollution, since a lot other factors are needed to be considered https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/408
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sorry USA, do you have still something to say, after checking such images and all previous posts / images?
Instead of just looking to picture 2, look at the other pictures, where China is still lower than USA! Yes, China need to improve, but don't take it as excuse!
Check previous post for pictures https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/476
Additional comment:
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/408
Images:
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/398
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/388
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/349
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/339
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/330
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/320
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/310
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/300
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/295
Backup: https://perma.cc/6X32-ZFY9
Instead of just looking to picture 2, look at the other pictures, where China is still lower than USA! Yes, China need to improve, but don't take it as excuse!
Check previous post for pictures https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/476
Additional comment:
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/408
Images:
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/398
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/388
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/349
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/339
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/330
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/320
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/310
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/300
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/295
Backup: https://perma.cc/6X32-ZFY9
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is the sad reality of our planet. Most people just want to believe the shit they want to believe, even if you prove with facts the opposite. This researcher is saying that for climate change, but in reality this happens for all aspects of their lifes, from their social network usage, to nutrition, to their behaviour when disasters happen, to their social pression behaviour changes, to their shopping behaviour to ...
Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now).
Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too.
Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.
Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now).
Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too.
Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sorry, it's wrong.
Rich people first trash money for shit, pollute our planet with their jets, yachts, luxury cars, buy fashion products derived from animals, giving a shit to human rights, eat or buy (to keep as toys / accessories) illegal imported animals, do space tourism by polluting a lot, die by visiting Titanic, say "poor people are the cause of pollution", try to create motivation bullshit how to live with few money (without having idea what this means), criticize poor countries that their fertility rates are too low by saying other bullshit, don't declare their money and don't pay taxes https://perma.cc/AU4N-7XRQ https://perma.cc/8LYC-HS5B, act like if they are doing all the job (when in reality they delegate all work to their employees!* and don't even take their responsibility when needed), just leave a brand as CEO if they do shit (just few of many examples https://perma.cc/S526-XNNT, https://perma.cc/8WG4-XDZQ), prefer to fire people, instead of cutting their overpaid salary for doing almost nothing, etc. AFTER THAT they invest money and use the rest for buying things, even if they don't really need to invest money, because they already own millions of dollars, that once they die, their fake 25 years old wife or their kids can get by thinking "we are so happy he died, finally i got the money" but say in the public "this was a tragic event, we will miss him a lot ..."
Obviously there are few decent CEO or rich people too, one of this is Pavel Durov, other are Mack family, Roger Federer (more the mentality, less about pollution ...), etc.
*except if the real CEO is still doing the same job, like when he launched the brand ... but currently big brands change CEO like whores change their clients, and when they do shit, they even get bonus or other things ... which is just a shame
Rich people first trash money for shit, pollute our planet with their jets, yachts, luxury cars, buy fashion products derived from animals, giving a shit to human rights, eat or buy (to keep as toys / accessories) illegal imported animals, do space tourism by polluting a lot, die by visiting Titanic, say "poor people are the cause of pollution", try to create motivation bullshit how to live with few money (without having idea what this means), criticize poor countries that their fertility rates are too low by saying other bullshit, don't declare their money and don't pay taxes https://perma.cc/AU4N-7XRQ https://perma.cc/8LYC-HS5B, act like if they are doing all the job (when in reality they delegate all work to their employees!* and don't even take their responsibility when needed), just leave a brand as CEO if they do shit (just few of many examples https://perma.cc/S526-XNNT, https://perma.cc/8WG4-XDZQ), prefer to fire people, instead of cutting their overpaid salary for doing almost nothing, etc. AFTER THAT they invest money and use the rest for buying things, even if they don't really need to invest money, because they already own millions of dollars, that once they die, their fake 25 years old wife or their kids can get by thinking "we are so happy he died, finally i got the money" but say in the public "this was a tragic event, we will miss him a lot ..."
Obviously there are few decent CEO or rich people too, one of this is Pavel Durov, other are Mack family, Roger Federer (more the mentality, less about pollution ...), etc.
*except if the real CEO is still doing the same job, like when he launched the brand ... but currently big brands change CEO like whores change their clients, and when they do shit, they even get bonus or other things ... which is just a shame
Yes, this is exactly what the world and even Elon Musk are doing with our planet. Great work WWF, showing that in a simply epic picture! Be ready Elon Musk, our project against your pollution bullshit will be launched soon. Between all men in the world, you are one of the worse.
@ElonMuskPollution @WWFFacts
@ElonMuskPollution @WWFFacts
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Yesterday (....), Interior gave the Willow Project a preliminary green light. Now, President Biden has the chance to make a final call. It's not too late to stop this carbon bomb.
If we don't, Willow will emit an estimated 280 million metric tons of climate pollution over the next 30 years. It's a make or break moment.
@MissionWillowProject
If we don't, Willow will emit an estimated 280 million metric tons of climate pollution over the next 30 years. It's a make or break moment.
@MissionWillowProject
Average = the most shitty useless information on this planet! ø data is saying ANYTHING, like per capita or total! This happens even related to finance / CO2 pollution and all other aspects in your life.
Previously https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.
As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)
Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.
First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!
ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.
Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG
So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....
About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E
Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing"
Previously https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.
As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)
Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.
First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://xn--r1a.website/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!
ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.
Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG
So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....
About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E
Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing"
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's time to wake up! But people still prefer to keep tomatoes on their eyes about all topics (not just climate change) ... because doing nothing and not reflect about such things is much easier. Even if you provide facts after investing weeks / months on searching such informations for them
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
(Part 1) Let we check now this bullshit using real facts, done by politicians, who prefer finding excuses, instead of changing ..
a) 0.041197% CO2 on the atmosphere - March 2019 concentration https://perma.cc/5N7H-A2QL
- Only 0.04% CO2? So probably is not important at all ... Who matter if there is 0.04% or 96% as "natural %" ...
DO YOU KNOW THAT IS ENOUGH LESS THAN 300MG TO DIE!! like Slobodan Praljak did https://perma.cc/FNC3-NLH8
"The lethal oral dose of KCN and NaCN for humans is between 0.5 and 3.5 mg/kg body weight." https://perma.cc/8T38-A57M
or just a small spermatozoon to make a girl pregnant! "A typical human spermatozoon has a distinct structure with an oval-shaped head (3–5 μm length and 2–3 μm width), a midpiece (7–8 μm), and a tail (45 μm)" https://perma.cc/QB4E-NLFU
So WTF is this idea about thinking about the % or size ... just idiots think in such ways ...
b) How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans? https://perma.cc/EQQ3-W4B5
Why not talking about atmospheric CO2 concentrations???????!!!!! See more
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/509
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/585
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/535
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/547
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/555
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/565
Climate myths: Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter WRITTEN IN 2007!!! not 2023 ... https://perma.cc/G655-A5NH
c) WTF are you talking about the "What is the carbon cycle?" https://perma.cc/VZ99-RMBS
Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources? https://perma.cc/EA6H-2RMG https://perma.cc/Q2ZT-W9P4
The big difference is that even if nature is producing CO2, they don't increase it in crazy mode like humans just to make 💶
For comparison, humans emit about 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year—100–300 times more than volcanoes—by burning fossil fuels https://perma.cc/D93K-VWP9
d) So your 4% of 0.04 = 0.0016 doesn't make any sense! "Anteil Deutschland = 1.76%"
Same shit this dude already said https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/1
a) 0.041197% CO2 on the atmosphere - March 2019 concentration https://perma.cc/5N7H-A2QL
- Only 0.04% CO2? So probably is not important at all ... Who matter if there is 0.04% or 96% as "natural %" ...
DO YOU KNOW THAT IS ENOUGH LESS THAN 300MG TO DIE!! like Slobodan Praljak did https://perma.cc/FNC3-NLH8
"The lethal oral dose of KCN and NaCN for humans is between 0.5 and 3.5 mg/kg body weight." https://perma.cc/8T38-A57M
or just a small spermatozoon to make a girl pregnant! "A typical human spermatozoon has a distinct structure with an oval-shaped head (3–5 μm length and 2–3 μm width), a midpiece (7–8 μm), and a tail (45 μm)" https://perma.cc/QB4E-NLFU
So WTF is this idea about thinking about the % or size ... just idiots think in such ways ...
b) How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans? https://perma.cc/EQQ3-W4B5
Why not talking about atmospheric CO2 concentrations???????!!!!! See more
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/509
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/585
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/535
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/547
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/555
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/565
Climate myths: Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter WRITTEN IN 2007!!! not 2023 ... https://perma.cc/G655-A5NH
c) WTF are you talking about the "What is the carbon cycle?" https://perma.cc/VZ99-RMBS
Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources? https://perma.cc/EA6H-2RMG https://perma.cc/Q2ZT-W9P4
The big difference is that even if nature is producing CO2, they don't increase it in crazy mode like humans just to make 💶
For comparison, humans emit about 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year—100–300 times more than volcanoes—by burning fossil fuels https://perma.cc/D93K-VWP9
d) So your 4% of 0.04 = 0.0016 doesn't make any sense! "Anteil Deutschland = 1.76%"
Same shit this dude already said https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
(Part 2) Bullshit over bullshit ... let we check facts
d) Our answer about the 1.76%
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/67
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/19
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/22
(0.04/100*4)/100*1.76 = 0.000028
First of all it's BULLSHIT, because you cannot merge the 4% "default CO2" with 1.75% and 4% by human activity ... maybe you could say that 0.04/100*1.76 = 0.0007
This way of thinking it's exact the same like
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/68
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/63
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/62
preferring to find bullshit excuses, instead of making something
same like this one
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/166
where our answer is available
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/181
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/WWFFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/MissionWillowProject
https://xn--r1a.website/EnergyFactsTelegram
https://xn--r1a.website/VeganFactsTelegram
etc.
Plus Germany is not 1.76%, but 1) it's depends which stats are you checking, for example per capita (check point e) or which website, just check for example
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/518
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/627
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/623
2) why are you not looking to the cumulative data too, where Germany has 5.37%! https://perma.cc/5D3Y-GZ6Y
As always such fake scientists (because politicians understand anything of any type of topic, doesn't matter if medicine, biology, etc.) just talk without considering all aspects ...
e) More about Germany pollution
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/585
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/408
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/615
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/611
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/595
Germany: CO2 Country Profile https://perma.cc/4XRE-FPY6
f) back to pollution done by nature ...
Most wildwires are done by humans so humans are polluting for the nature!
Plus where the fuck you got the 4% by humans ... check https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/670
maybe you mean that dermal CO2 is 4% of total body CO2 emission ... ahha
All in one channel answer:
https://xn--r1a.website/DeutschlandBullshit/2
d) Our answer about the 1.76%
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/67
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/19
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/22
(0.04/100*4)/100*1.76 = 0.000028
First of all it's BULLSHIT, because you cannot merge the 4% "default CO2" with 1.75% and 4% by human activity ... maybe you could say that 0.04/100*1.76 = 0.0007
This way of thinking it's exact the same like
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/68
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/63
https://xn--r1a.website/ClimateChangeTelegram/62
preferring to find bullshit excuses, instead of making something
same like this one
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/166
where our answer is available
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/181
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/WWFFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/MissionWillowProject
https://xn--r1a.website/EnergyFactsTelegram
https://xn--r1a.website/VeganFactsTelegram
etc.
Plus Germany is not 1.76%, but 1) it's depends which stats are you checking, for example per capita (check point e) or which website, just check for example
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/518
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/627
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/623
2) why are you not looking to the cumulative data too, where Germany has 5.37%! https://perma.cc/5D3Y-GZ6Y
As always such fake scientists (because politicians understand anything of any type of topic, doesn't matter if medicine, biology, etc.) just talk without considering all aspects ...
e) More about Germany pollution
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/585
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/408
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/615
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/611
https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/595
Germany: CO2 Country Profile https://perma.cc/4XRE-FPY6
f) back to pollution done by nature ...
Most wildwires are done by humans so humans are polluting for the nature!
Plus where the fuck you got the 4% by humans ... check https://xn--r1a.website/PollutionFacts/670
maybe you mean that dermal CO2 is 4% of total body CO2 emission ... ahha
All in one channel answer:
https://xn--r1a.website/DeutschlandBullshit/2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UN Report: Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’ https://perma.cc/7VV6-BR95
Based on the systematic review of about 15,000 scientific and government sources, the Report also draws (for the first time ever at this scale) on indigenous and local knowledge, particularly addressing issues relevant to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
The average abundance of native species in most major land-based habitats has fallen by at least 20%, mostly since 1900. More than 40% of amphibian species, almost 33% of reef-forming corals and more than a third of all marine mammals are threatened. The picture is less clear for insect species, but available evidence supports a tentative estimate of 10% being threatened. At least 680 vertebrate species had been driven to extinction since the 16th century and more than 9% of all domesticated breeds of mammals used for food and agriculture had become extinct by 2016, with at least 1,000 more breeds still threatened.
Other notable findings of the Report include:
- Three-quarters of the land-based environment and about 66% of the marine environment have been significantly altered by human actions. On average these trends have been less severe or avoided in areas held or managed by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
- More than a third of the world’s land surface and nearly 75% of freshwater resources are now devoted to crop or livestock production.
- The value of agricultural crop production has increased by about 300% since 1970, raw timber harvest has risen by 45% and approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are now extracted globally every year – having nearly doubled since 1980.
- Land degradation has reduced the productivity of 23% of the global land surface, up to US$577 billion in annual global crops are at risk from pollinator loss ...
- In 2015, 33% of marine fish stocks were being harvested at unsustainable levels; 60% were maximally sustainably fished, ...
- etc.
Based on the systematic review of about 15,000 scientific and government sources, the Report also draws (for the first time ever at this scale) on indigenous and local knowledge, particularly addressing issues relevant to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
The average abundance of native species in most major land-based habitats has fallen by at least 20%, mostly since 1900. More than 40% of amphibian species, almost 33% of reef-forming corals and more than a third of all marine mammals are threatened. The picture is less clear for insect species, but available evidence supports a tentative estimate of 10% being threatened. At least 680 vertebrate species had been driven to extinction since the 16th century and more than 9% of all domesticated breeds of mammals used for food and agriculture had become extinct by 2016, with at least 1,000 more breeds still threatened.
Other notable findings of the Report include:
- Three-quarters of the land-based environment and about 66% of the marine environment have been significantly altered by human actions. On average these trends have been less severe or avoided in areas held or managed by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
- More than a third of the world’s land surface and nearly 75% of freshwater resources are now devoted to crop or livestock production.
- The value of agricultural crop production has increased by about 300% since 1970, raw timber harvest has risen by 45% and approximately 60 billion tons of renewable and nonrenewable resources are now extracted globally every year – having nearly doubled since 1980.
- Land degradation has reduced the productivity of 23% of the global land surface, up to US$577 billion in annual global crops are at risk from pollinator loss ...
- In 2015, 33% of marine fish stocks were being harvested at unsustainable levels; 60% were maximally sustainably fished, ...
- etc.
Now it's time to talk about shit social networks and pro pollution social networks that are not fighting for good things. We already talked about Flickr weeks ago, where they disabled all climate changes projects, like all other projects, so no matter the topic.
Flickr is definitely one of the worst in 2023, in fact we included it (months before this story) in the list of social networks that downgraded the service in the last years, near many other (last picture).
Flickr like said prefer to promote abuse / spam / sex / etc. by even banning legit paid accounts, just read Flickr reviews ...
We launched years ago FacebookDisabledMe on Reddit and many other socials, against the no sense random Facebook account ban, even for ads account etc. The same shit problem available on Reddit (obviously on Instagram too, since is made by Meta ...) and in parts on Twitter, no matter if you are a brand, celeb, government ... Tumblr is nothing better too, they act in the same exact way! We never launched new projects on such shit social, but still doesn't change the fact they do that since few years.
We already reported few days ago that Facebook temporary banned Telegram, by disabling various projects, even climate change related, if they contained a Telegram link. So they disabled such things, even when we promoted the official climate change Facebook page ...
Obviously #facebookdisabledme is not fixed at all and still present in 2023! They maybe disable just accounts used to post manually things to Facebook, means you could lose your pages ... No matter who is doing that ...
Well, last social is TikTok, a social network that if you use it as an agency (means multiple brands) they shadow ban all your account with the 0 views issue. Reason why on TikTok there is a lot of bullshit and almost no content with facts released by us, since all is shadow ban, no matter in which language we post or about which topic. So TikTok remain full of bullshit.
In conclusion: Flickr, Meta (Facebook, Instagram), Reddit and TikTok 0 views
Flickr is definitely one of the worst in 2023, in fact we included it (months before this story) in the list of social networks that downgraded the service in the last years, near many other (last picture).
Flickr like said prefer to promote abuse / spam / sex / etc. by even banning legit paid accounts, just read Flickr reviews ...
We launched years ago FacebookDisabledMe on Reddit and many other socials, against the no sense random Facebook account ban, even for ads account etc. The same shit problem available on Reddit (obviously on Instagram too, since is made by Meta ...) and in parts on Twitter, no matter if you are a brand, celeb, government ... Tumblr is nothing better too, they act in the same exact way! We never launched new projects on such shit social, but still doesn't change the fact they do that since few years.
We already reported few days ago that Facebook temporary banned Telegram, by disabling various projects, even climate change related, if they contained a Telegram link. So they disabled such things, even when we promoted the official climate change Facebook page ...
Obviously #facebookdisabledme is not fixed at all and still present in 2023! They maybe disable just accounts used to post manually things to Facebook, means you could lose your pages ... No matter who is doing that ...
Well, last social is TikTok, a social network that if you use it as an agency (means multiple brands) they shadow ban all your account with the 0 views issue. Reason why on TikTok there is a lot of bullshit and almost no content with facts released by us, since all is shadow ban, no matter in which language we post or about which topic. So TikTok remain full of bullshit.
In conclusion: Flickr, Meta (Facebook, Instagram), Reddit and TikTok 0 views