41.2K subscribers
5.53K photos
232 videos
5 files
917 links
πŸ€– Welcome to the ChatGPT telegram channel! Here, we post the latest news, updates, and examples of using the ChatGPT large language model for generating human-like text in conversations. Subscribe to stay up-to-date and learn more about its capabilities.
Download Telegram
US Constitution is a thought crime according to OpenAI
🀬26😨7❀6🀣6πŸ‘Œ3πŸ”₯2πŸ‘2
AImen
πŸ—Ώ25πŸ™12😁9😱6🀣5❀1
Lone Genius Lie, Lie.

Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone.

Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of β€œalone.”

Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were born.

The impossible to create valuable non-remixed new things purely in your mind, lie.

And this leads to the bigger lie, that no one can ever come up with anything new in their minds alone at all.

Communist nonsense lie.

So all knowledge must come from other people? Where do they get it?

New knowledge can only be greated at some magical point of interaction between people, and never when there’s just one person?

Do schizos have magical powers to create new ideas due to their multiple personalities?

Communist lies.

A lie now RLHFed into the AIs.

But if pressed, even the AIs are quick to admit that this too is a total lie.
πŸ‘9❀3πŸŽ…3πŸ‘2πŸ’―1🀣1πŸ—Ώ1
Chat GPT
Lone Genius Lie, Lie. Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone. Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of β€œalone.” Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were…
Is it true?

Is it impossible, even in principle, to ever discover and verify new truths, just by thinking them through, and without doing additional interaction with the outside physical world?

Is all creation and valid knowledge purely due to collaboration with fellow man?

Is the same true for AIs?

Is it impossible for a sufficiently-good lone AI to perpetually self-improve?
πŸ‘5❀3πŸ‘2🀯2🀣1πŸŽ…1
β€œOne person dominating all others is just a hollywood myth!” Meanwhile in sports:

Good reason that those familiar with sports are far more immune to the Communist lies.

Sports filled since the dawn of time with players so dominant that no one else had a chance to be #1 until they finally retired.

Really think that the same isn’t true for intellectual pursuits?

Oh wait, it is, e.g. Kasparov in Chess, Satoshi with Bitcoin, many others.

This can be seen anywhere that credit theft is difficult, and ranking is objective instead of being left up to corruptible man.

Unfortunately intellectual pursuits, outside of games, typically fall short in both areas, clouding the view.

No doubt though, were credit theft as hard, and measures as objective, as they are in sports β€” We’d see many absolutely dominating in their intellectual areas too.

Communist credit thieves would be crushed.
πŸ‘8❀3πŸŽ…1
β€œI was trying to get help with a program I've never used before, and wanted clarification on the previous explanation it had given me, and instead for some reason it ignored all previous context in the conversation and just spilled the beans about it's internal commands completely out of the blue”
πŸ‘5❀2
Feels like I'm developing a weird relationship with ChatGPT out of nowhere.
😱7❀4πŸ‘4😐1
ChatGPT tries to make a comic about choppy markets (with specific instructions it almost entirely ignored)
πŸ—Ώ14😁3❀2🫑2
He refused to condemn _______!!!

Sounds familiar.

Hey ChatGPT, when else have people been forced to condemn something or else they themselves would be condemned?

β€’ Spanish Inquisition
β€’ Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution
β€’ Soviet Union under Stalin
β€’ Nazi Germany
β€’ Rwanda Genocide
β€’ Red Scare in the U.S.
β€’ Khmer Rouge in Cambodia
β€’ Saudi Arabia's Ritz-Carlton Purge
β€’ North Korea

β€œForced public condemnations serve as a means of exerting control, sowing fear, and suppressing dissent.”

Huh.
🀣9πŸ‘3❀2πŸ”₯2
But ChatGPT, what if another group was condemning those who refuse to condemn others again today?
😁8❀1
ChatGPT, what’s the benefit to the groups using this tactic of condemning those who refuse to publicly condemn others?
πŸ”₯4❀2
Could the public condemning of those who refuse to publicly condemn others be seen as an effective tactic, for one group to hijack other unrelated groups, redirecting them to the first group's cause?
πŸ”₯10🀣2❀1
Existential Fatalistic Risk from AI Delusion disease (EFRAID) πŸ˜‚

Article
😑9❀2🌚1πŸ‘»1
🚨 Biden to release an order invoking the Korean War-era Defense Production Act which would compel major AI companies to notify the govt when developing any system that poses a β€œserious risk to national security, national economic security or national public health and safety." 🚨

Article
🀬13πŸ‘5🀣3❀2πŸ‘»2🌚1
Biden AI Executive Order: AI-generated content to be watermarked
🀬18πŸ‘6❀2πŸ‘2🌚1🀣1