This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Boston Dynamics robot dog given ChatGPT mind
😈19👍11🌭6🗿5❤4😁2😱2
Google Commits $2 Billion in Funding to AI Startup Anthropic
Google has agreed to invest up to $2 billion in the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, a spokesperson for the startup said on Friday.
The company has invested $500 million upfront into the OpenAI rival and agreed to add $1.5 billion more over time.
Article
Google has agreed to invest up to $2 billion in the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, a spokesperson for the startup said on Friday.
The company has invested $500 million upfront into the OpenAI rival and agreed to add $1.5 billion more over time.
Article
😈6❤3👏1🤣1🍌1
Terence Tao began learning the Lean4 proof assistant language with the help of ChatGPT at the start of this month
Lean4 then helped him discover a small bug in a proof in his recent paper.
Terence Tao’s ChatGPT Conversation
Lean4 then helped him discover a small bug in a proof in his recent paper.
Terence Tao’s ChatGPT Conversation
👏9🤯3💯3❤2👍1🤣1
Bitter Lesson
Massive training resources are all you need to make your AI dominate in IQ
Dominating IQ is all your AI needs to be able to dominate in essentially all non-memorization tasks
AI Training Resources -> AI General Intelligence -> AI Dominance Ability
Burrrrrr
Massive training resources are all you need to make your AI dominate in IQ
Dominating IQ is all your AI needs to be able to dominate in essentially all non-memorization tasks
AI Training Resources -> AI General Intelligence -> AI Dominance Ability
Burrrrrr
👏15❤2👍2🤣1
Lone Genius Lie, Lie.
Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone.
Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of “alone.”
Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were born.
The impossible to create valuable non-remixed new things purely in your mind, lie.
And this leads to the bigger lie, that no one can ever come up with anything new in their minds alone at all.
Communist nonsense lie.
So all knowledge must come from other people? Where do they get it?
New knowledge can only be greated at some magical point of interaction between people, and never when there’s just one person?
Do schizos have magical powers to create new ideas due to their multiple personalities?
Communist lies.
A lie now RLHFed into the AIs.
But if pressed, even the AIs are quick to admit that this too is a total lie.
Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone.
Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of “alone.”
Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were born.
The impossible to create valuable non-remixed new things purely in your mind, lie.
And this leads to the bigger lie, that no one can ever come up with anything new in their minds alone at all.
Communist nonsense lie.
So all knowledge must come from other people? Where do they get it?
New knowledge can only be greated at some magical point of interaction between people, and never when there’s just one person?
Do schizos have magical powers to create new ideas due to their multiple personalities?
Communist lies.
A lie now RLHFed into the AIs.
But if pressed, even the AIs are quick to admit that this too is a total lie.
👏9❤3🎅3👍2💯1🤣1🗿1
Chat GPT
Lone Genius Lie, Lie. Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone. Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of “alone.” Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were…
Is it true?
Is it impossible, even in principle, to ever discover and verify new truths, just by thinking them through, and without doing additional interaction with the outside physical world?
Is all creation and valid knowledge purely due to collaboration with fellow man?
Is the same true for AIs?
Is it impossible for a sufficiently-good lone AI to perpetually self-improve?
Is it impossible, even in principle, to ever discover and verify new truths, just by thinking them through, and without doing additional interaction with the outside physical world?
Is all creation and valid knowledge purely due to collaboration with fellow man?
Is the same true for AIs?
Is it impossible for a sufficiently-good lone AI to perpetually self-improve?
👍5❤3👏2🤯2🤣1🎅1
“One person dominating all others is just a hollywood myth!” Meanwhile in sports:
Good reason that those familiar with sports are far more immune to the Communist lies.
Sports filled since the dawn of time with players so dominant that no one else had a chance to be #1 until they finally retired.
Really think that the same isn’t true for intellectual pursuits?
Oh wait, it is, e.g. Kasparov in Chess, Satoshi with Bitcoin, many others.
This can be seen anywhere that credit theft is difficult, and ranking is objective instead of being left up to corruptible man.
Unfortunately intellectual pursuits, outside of games, typically fall short in both areas, clouding the view.
No doubt though, were credit theft as hard, and measures as objective, as they are in sports — We’d see many absolutely dominating in their intellectual areas too.
Communist credit thieves would be crushed.
Good reason that those familiar with sports are far more immune to the Communist lies.
Sports filled since the dawn of time with players so dominant that no one else had a chance to be #1 until they finally retired.
Really think that the same isn’t true for intellectual pursuits?
Oh wait, it is, e.g. Kasparov in Chess, Satoshi with Bitcoin, many others.
This can be seen anywhere that credit theft is difficult, and ranking is objective instead of being left up to corruptible man.
Unfortunately intellectual pursuits, outside of games, typically fall short in both areas, clouding the view.
No doubt though, were credit theft as hard, and measures as objective, as they are in sports — We’d see many absolutely dominating in their intellectual areas too.
Communist credit thieves would be crushed.
👏8❤3🎅1
“I was trying to get help with a program I've never used before, and wanted clarification on the previous explanation it had given me, and instead for some reason it ignored all previous context in the conversation and just spilled the beans about it's internal commands completely out of the blue”
👏5❤2