Arizona Conservatives Take Action
4.4K subscribers
1.75K photos
448 videos
36 files
3.18K links
This is a resource and action page for Arizona-supporting patriots to stay informed and promote America First policies throughout the state. We are hyper-focused on fraud exposure, election reform, RINO recalls, and rebuilding our GOP. #SaveAmerica🇺🇸
Download Telegram
AZ House passes bill banning Critical Race Theory in schools: “Racism cannot be controlled by teaching children to be racist.”

🔗AZ Legislature Press Release
AZ GOP - We Hope Signature Verification Will Take Place As Audit Continues To Possibly End Of June

Read:🔗 CD Media

As Trooper astutely points out, signature verification is only required if a Democrat is facing a recall.

Many thanks to top conservative news source @CreativeDestructionMedia for quoting our AZ update post.
———
We have just learned that he county supervisors did not have the password to the machines, just Dominion. Was that in the contract? Another reason to not Sine Die so we can fix that legislatively.
-Senator Kelly Townsend Twitter

🔗Learn more
Asked what he wasn't able to do to evaluate the voting machines because they are missing certain passwords, he said they would not be able to gain administrative access that they believe that would allow them to run batch reports on ballots.

On batch reports...

Batch reports a way that the auditors could break down the ballots by groups as they count, to compare to the county's count.

Without them, they can only compare the final totals.
-Jen Fifield Twitter

🔗Learn more
Senate Liaison Ken Bennett said the Senate is considering filing a motion to compel/other subpoenas to Maricopa County to try to get the password/keys they did not receive, so they could gain administrative access.
-Jen Fifield Twitter

🔗Learn more
OAN Reviews Impotent Letter From DOJ Trying To Stop Ariz. Audit

The United States Constitution grants the power to oversee elections exclusively to state legislatures, meaning the federal government has no authority to interfere in the audit. The letter was fairly benign and only cited media reports as evidence.

The main issues raised were with regard to voting rights, especially for minority voters, and the security of the facility, both of which have been easily addressed by the Senate. In fact, the letter did not include a single piece of factual evidence on which the DOJ could base their concerns.

Read🔗DOJ Letter
Read more🔗 OANN
Bennett responds to the two concerns in the DOJ letter:

1. On lack of ballot security, "That is completely unfounded." There has been 24/7 security and video surveillance, the building is secure.

"Nobody is in the building that shouldn't be in the building."

2. On potential voter intimidation, he said "If I have anything to do with it, there won't be any voter intimidation."

I asked if he would have something to do with it. "I hope so." Not going door to door, but he find out what plan is. "I haven't seen that part of the audit."
-Jen Fifield Twitter

Read🔗DOJ Letter
Learn more 🔗OANN
Arizona Conservatives Take Action
Photo
Where are you going Katie Hobbs? | TGP’s Jordan Conradson Twitter
———-
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
OAN’s Christina Bobb: “It sounds like Dominion, a private company, actually has more control over the elections than the County Supervisors.”

🔗Learn more
🔗Link to video
Cyber Ninjas Statement: Settlement Changes Nothing

Arizona Senate Republicans' lead auditor, Cyber Ninjas, responds to settlement of lawsuit filed by AZ Democratic Party: "Settlement changes nothing .. It is a tool being used by enemies of transparent democracy to pursue a narrative undermining the most comprehensive election audit in American history."

Cyber Ninjas goes onto say that signature verification was “never in the scope of the audit in the first place, and would not have been done. “

Learn more🔗Settlement Agreement
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Senate President Karen Fann diplomatically manages Arizona Horizon’s Blue Anon Ted Simmons

Fann describes being threatened daily with lawsuits and four letter words. “They do not want this audit,” Fann says. “They talk about conspiracy theories… well, there is almost a reverse conspiracy theory now to demean this audit.”

Responding to the Dem’s crutch claim that the Board of Supervisors already conducted audits and found no irregularities, Fann explains that the Maricopa BOS only looked at 2%! of the ballots. Furthermore, they did not choose forensic auditors, they chose 2 firms (Pro V&V and SLI) that are only authorized to certify machines — and Pro V&V certified the machines to begin with.

The people have a right to feel confident in their elections. “If we don’t do it, who will?” Fann asked Simmons.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Slippery Ray Valenzuela from the Maricopa County Recorders Office: When we partner with Dominion, it’s not for them to run the election. …They’re just there contractually to support us [😉😉] on Election Day in case a tabulator goes down, in case we need to clean that mylar…. [in case we need them to enter that admin password ]

Video: CodeMonkeyZ
Happy Friday lovely Deplorables!🌞🌅😎🇺🇸💗

How can you help fight THE BIG LIE today?

❗️Sign the recall Hobbs petition and share the info with a friend.

❗️Take a minute to write the AZ legislature. We need them to extend their session to fix the problems revealed by the audit. Fill out this AZ Legislature 2021 Session End Date Survey.

❗️Help the AZ audit fill 200 new positions and double it’s pace: signup to volunteer.

❗️Take a few minutes to support Michigan. Write the Michigan Senators to demand a full forensic audit of the 2020 election. As you remember, we had to write the Arizona Senate EVERYDAY for months to get the audit in Maricopa. We’ve made it easy, just copy and paste:🔗Learn more
Why Did Maricopa Have a 12% Adjudication Rate? This September 2020 Article Provides a Clue: Maricopa County Recorder Fontes Ignores Supreme Court Ruling, Advises Voters To Cross Out Errors

“I was disappointed to see that after being ordered by a court to stop telling voters to intentionally spoil their ballot, county recorder Adrian Fontes has taken to twitter to tell voters to do just that,” said Alexander Kolodin, attorney for the Arizona Public Integrity Alliance. “Never in my career have I seen a recorder with such blatant contempt for the letter and the spirit of the law.”

Read:🔗 Arizona Daily Independent
Learn more:🔗 Blue Anon Fontes
Learn more:🔗 Adjudication Process

This wasn’t the only shady election management practice by Fontes. @AZinformer tracked his many fraud-enabling rule changes on Twitter last year, noting that “elections have consequences and Arizona is paying dearly with a Leftist SOS and County Recorder.”

"It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes."
- Stalin
Read more:🔗AZ Informer Twitter
——————
👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Former Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes: “I’m rooting for Dominion! …Maricopa had such a big contract with Dominion that they had offices inside the ballot tabulation center with 2 full time employees!”

Who needs administrative passwords when you have reliable leftist Dominion employees on site to handle the vote tabulation systems for you.

Learn more:🐍 Adrian Fontes
So dirtbag Ducey will provide 24-hour state troopers for hide-the-fraud Hobbs but not for America’s audit.

Sign the petition to RECALL Ducey and Hobbs: 🔗Learn more
JUST IN. Audit Liaison Ken Bennett🇺🇸Responds to SoS Katie Hobbs

“With all due respect, [your letter] reads like a political press release calculated to undermine a process that you have opposed since its inception. You will surely recall that when the audit was in the planning stages, the Senates representatives extended invitations to you and your fellow Democrats to collaborate in the formulation of audit procedures, which you rebuffed. My first act as the Senate Liaison was to reach out to the AZ Democratic Party to ask for a Democrat Co-Liaison to work beside me throughout the audit, which was rejected 3 times. … Needless to say, these rejections detract from the credibility of your professed interest in the conduct of the audit.

“Your decision to wait to send your letter until right after signing your settlement agreement demonstrates a degree of bad faith. You clearly had these concerns before signing the settlement agreement, and you could have raised them with us or incorporated them into the agreement before releasing your claims. Pursuant to Sections 2 and 3 of the Settlement Agreement, inter alia, you agreed to release all claims advanced in the litigation, including your claims that the auditor’s policies are legally inadequate or not “consistent with state and federal statutory and constitutional law and the EPM, including with respect to the security and integrity of ballots and election equipment.” (See Motion to Intervene filed on April 28th, 2021, page 8, inter alia.) Therefore, to the extent that you still question the adequacy of the auditor’s policies, you have released those claims; and to the extent that your letter implies that you intend to take any further legal action on that basis, you are in breach of the Settlement Agreement.

[…]

"As to your other concerns of risk, confusion, errors, and disregard of best practices, I suggest that these are opinions of your observers, with which I respectfully disagree. You have personally referred to this audit as a “Fraudit”, which confirms a bias and, therefore, lack of credibility far beyond the lack of credibility you assert. I can only believe that your bias is being
transmitted through the observers you send. Still, we welcome them and their input on how to make the audit successful."

Read:🔥 Bennett’s Response
Read:🔗 Hobbs Letter
————
Vacuous Statement From RINO Chairman Jack Sellers on What Was Provided to the Senate

I am not going to address every allegation that people cook up these days, but I do want to talk about passwords.  The specific password and security tokens Ken Bennett referenced this week provide access to proprietary firmware and source code. Elections administrators do not need to access this information to hold an election, and we do not have it in our custody.”

Read more:🔗 Sellers Statement
Learn more:🔗 BOS Withholding Admin Passwords
————