finchem newsletter.pdf
4.1 MB
ELECTION INTEGRITY BILLS UNDER CONSIDERATION
SB-1485 deals with removing people from the permanent early ballot list who have not used their early ballot for 4 consecutive elections. Use it or lose it! Unused ballots are a gold mine for fraud in the electoral system. This bill is now in the House and expected to PASS
HB-2569 deals with a prohibition of private funding to counties for elections
(Zuckerberg election interference). When private money infiltrates public elections, the thumb of the left distorts the outcome. "But this is because the state doesn't give enough funding," they say. Horse feathers! This bill is now in the Senate and expected to PASS
HCR-2023 concerns the proper authority for elections, which is the state not the federal government. This is a resolution that would notify Congress that we assert our State of AZ authority over elections. It is a direct response to the attempted takeover of Arizona's elections from HR 1. This bill is now in the House and expected to PASS
SB-1485 deals with removing people from the permanent early ballot list who have not used their early ballot for 4 consecutive elections. Use it or lose it! Unused ballots are a gold mine for fraud in the electoral system. This bill is now in the House and expected to PASS
HB-2569 deals with a prohibition of private funding to counties for elections
(Zuckerberg election interference). When private money infiltrates public elections, the thumb of the left distorts the outcome. "But this is because the state doesn't give enough funding," they say. Horse feathers! This bill is now in the Senate and expected to PASS
HCR-2023 concerns the proper authority for elections, which is the state not the federal government. This is a resolution that would notify Congress that we assert our State of AZ authority over elections. It is a direct response to the attempted takeover of Arizona's elections from HR 1. This bill is now in the House and expected to PASS
Disturbing Voting Machine Facts from Jovan Pulitzer:
#VotingMachines did you know it's up to individual county officials to assure voting machines are secure, yet most don't have any security training or even a security professional on their staffs? #NoFreakingWonder
#VotingMachine audits and "boater frogged" did u know the very people who could go to jail 4 #boaterfrogged (say it fast) get to decide WHICH machines are audited? Talk about job security. It's a broken system from top to bottom.
#VotingMachineHistory #BoaterFrogged did you know that voting machines can be software "updated w software patches" even on the morning or during the day of an election? And it is all unchecked, unverified with ZERO real accountability and oversight? #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory Our government commissioned a massive study on problems with #VotingMachines and the report revealed 328 major security flaws 26 critical to protecting America! But in the 200 page report 131 pages were redacted so no one could see what they were! #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know vote swapping and huge miscount in GA happened before? It was in Fulton Co Georgia and all reported no #BoaterFrogged here but 300,000 votes mingled thanks to a special file named "rob.georgia" #truthbomb #WeHaveBeenHereBefore #NothingToSeeHere
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know that in order to hide #BoaterFrogged in machines you can enter "negative votes" ?Yes enter staring count - ×××× and as each bad dupe vote comes in it ticks off and magically balances at end of voting and audit checks #WTF
If #VotingMachines can optically scan and then tally all votes, why is there a function to go in and manually change the vote counts in these machines and databases? There can only be nefarious reasons for a "manual entry override" #WTF #NothingToSeeHere
#VotingMachineHistory if "the machines don't connect to the Internet " then why do the manuals have "remote access to the database" which any admin can access? Why would an election supervisor need "remote access" anyway? #NothingToSeeHere #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory which state historically enacted the most draconian laws to make it difficult to audit voting machines? Took 1 patent attorney 2 mechanics appointed by law to look at the machines if anyone had questions? The answer is ...Georgia
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know MULTIPLE administrators can access votes log? Anyone can correct vote counts at any time. Creates one edited file one old file and a NEW file to be assigned. For example new old file to match edited new file" Why 3 sets of books needed? #WTF
#VotingMachines did you know it's up to individual county officials to assure voting machines are secure, yet most don't have any security training or even a security professional on their staffs? #NoFreakingWonder
#VotingMachine audits and "boater frogged" did u know the very people who could go to jail 4 #boaterfrogged (say it fast) get to decide WHICH machines are audited? Talk about job security. It's a broken system from top to bottom.
#VotingMachineHistory #BoaterFrogged did you know that voting machines can be software "updated w software patches" even on the morning or during the day of an election? And it is all unchecked, unverified with ZERO real accountability and oversight? #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory Our government commissioned a massive study on problems with #VotingMachines and the report revealed 328 major security flaws 26 critical to protecting America! But in the 200 page report 131 pages were redacted so no one could see what they were! #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know vote swapping and huge miscount in GA happened before? It was in Fulton Co Georgia and all reported no #BoaterFrogged here but 300,000 votes mingled thanks to a special file named "rob.georgia" #truthbomb #WeHaveBeenHereBefore #NothingToSeeHere
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know that in order to hide #BoaterFrogged in machines you can enter "negative votes" ?Yes enter staring count - ×××× and as each bad dupe vote comes in it ticks off and magically balances at end of voting and audit checks #WTF
If #VotingMachines can optically scan and then tally all votes, why is there a function to go in and manually change the vote counts in these machines and databases? There can only be nefarious reasons for a "manual entry override" #WTF #NothingToSeeHere
#VotingMachineHistory if "the machines don't connect to the Internet " then why do the manuals have "remote access to the database" which any admin can access? Why would an election supervisor need "remote access" anyway? #NothingToSeeHere #WTF
#VotingMachineHistory which state historically enacted the most draconian laws to make it difficult to audit voting machines? Took 1 patent attorney 2 mechanics appointed by law to look at the machines if anyone had questions? The answer is ...Georgia
#VotingMachineHistory Did you know MULTIPLE administrators can access votes log? Anyone can correct vote counts at any time. Creates one edited file one old file and a NEW file to be assigned. For example new old file to match edited new file" Why 3 sets of books needed? #WTF
Copy of the AZ Senate’s January subpoena to the Board of Supervisors
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cy6uW51Ej4u40di8ojrSWSFrjUSilIFD/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cy6uW51Ej4u40di8ojrSWSFrjUSilIFD/view
Copy of the AZ Senate’s December subpoena to the Board of Supervisors
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kjAgHga77UZ-vkPEGJDsTon-z8qGyCSx/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kjAgHga77UZ-vkPEGJDsTon-z8qGyCSx/view
Gail Golec, AZ Citizen Activist, Special Guest on HUB Radio Phoenix
In this interview Gail underscores that the equipment audit must take place at the Maricopa County Tabulation & Election Center (MTEC) and the Senate’s January subpoena grants the Senate full access and control. Among other things, the subpoena specifies that the Senate has “access or control of ALL routers, tabulators or combinations thereof, used in connection with the administration of the 2020 election, and the public IP of the router.”
She also describes hacking into MTEC’s nest cameras (min 8:00), accessing the entire file system of the County Recorder, and observing workers tampering with the voting machines. “Nine tabulation machines performed 93% of all tabulation. All nine have been disassembled and reassembled.”
This talk dovetails with Gail’s talk with Liz Harris on 4/9 (link below).
Watch:🔗Gail Golec
Learn more:🔗Gail & Liz
Read:🔗Senate’s January subpoena
In this interview Gail underscores that the equipment audit must take place at the Maricopa County Tabulation & Election Center (MTEC) and the Senate’s January subpoena grants the Senate full access and control. Among other things, the subpoena specifies that the Senate has “access or control of ALL routers, tabulators or combinations thereof, used in connection with the administration of the 2020 election, and the public IP of the router.”
She also describes hacking into MTEC’s nest cameras (min 8:00), accessing the entire file system of the County Recorder, and observing workers tampering with the voting machines. “Nine tabulation machines performed 93% of all tabulation. All nine have been disassembled and reassembled.”
This talk dovetails with Gail’s talk with Liz Harris on 4/9 (link below).
Watch:🔗Gail Golec
Learn more:🔗Gail & Liz
Read:🔗Senate’s January subpoena
From “Follow the Data” with Dr. Frank
Think about it for a second... the Secretary of State has certified the election. But...Since showing you guys how to check your own voting record, I've already received several messages from folks informing me that their votes are not recorded there, for a total of about a dozen ballots so far, and you guys are only just getting started.
When Joe Blystone wrote the Secretary of State, they assured him that it was a clerical error. If your vote is not recorded there, and you contact the Secretary of State, I imagine that you will receive the same excuse. But think about it for a second... The ballots tallied by the machines matches the ballots tallied in the database. At least, that is what the Secretary of State has certified. So then, whose ballots were actually tallied in the count?
I have been aggressively studying the election data since late December. Believe me, I have reams and reams of such forensic evidence. The fun part about this situation is that YOU can confirm in small part what I have proven in large part.
And now that you realize that I am not making this up, perhaps you will join the movement for election reform in our country. Believe me, as serious as this is, this is only a minor symptom of the real problem.
For now, you need to understand at least these things, if you ever again want to have real elections:
1) We must have paper ballots, cast in person, with photo ID.
2) We must only count them after they are all turned in, manually, after the polls are closed.
3) Each precinct must maintain a paper poll-book, that is the arbiter of voting on election day (most precincts are only several hundred voters).
4) There are some valid reasons for absentee ballots, but they must be rare.
@FollowTheData
Think about it for a second... the Secretary of State has certified the election. But...Since showing you guys how to check your own voting record, I've already received several messages from folks informing me that their votes are not recorded there, for a total of about a dozen ballots so far, and you guys are only just getting started.
When Joe Blystone wrote the Secretary of State, they assured him that it was a clerical error. If your vote is not recorded there, and you contact the Secretary of State, I imagine that you will receive the same excuse. But think about it for a second... The ballots tallied by the machines matches the ballots tallied in the database. At least, that is what the Secretary of State has certified. So then, whose ballots were actually tallied in the count?
I have been aggressively studying the election data since late December. Believe me, I have reams and reams of such forensic evidence. The fun part about this situation is that YOU can confirm in small part what I have proven in large part.
And now that you realize that I am not making this up, perhaps you will join the movement for election reform in our country. Believe me, as serious as this is, this is only a minor symptom of the real problem.
For now, you need to understand at least these things, if you ever again want to have real elections:
1) We must have paper ballots, cast in person, with photo ID.
2) We must only count them after they are all turned in, manually, after the polls are closed.
3) Each precinct must maintain a paper poll-book, that is the arbiter of voting on election day (most precincts are only several hundred voters).
4) There are some valid reasons for absentee ballots, but they must be rare.
@FollowTheData
EXCLUSIVE: The Democrats’ Attorney Marc Elias Has His Army of Radical Lawyers Ready to Threaten and Stop Any Election Audit in Maricopa County Arizona
Steve Bannon of the WarRoom Pandemic, Peter Navarro, who wrote an incredible three-part analysis explaining the 2020 election steal, The Navarro Report, and Mike Lindell, who co-produced and hosted two documentaries about the 2020 election steal, have all repeatedly stated ‘that if just one of these swing states fall, they’ll all fall like a house of cards.’
So, to prevent ‘this house of cards from falling’ and any election tampering and fraud being exposed, the Democratic hit team blew into Arizona, a top Democrat-run nonprofit at the helm, with three law firms in tow to shut this thing in Arizona down.
The Protect Democracy Project (PDP) nonprofit, which is in reality functioning as a weaponized, political tool of the Democrats, sicced not one, not two, but three law firms on the Arizona Senate’s audit teams: Perkins Coie and two Arizona firms, Coppersmith Brockelman, and Barton Mendez Soto.
Read more:🔗GP
Steve Bannon of the WarRoom Pandemic, Peter Navarro, who wrote an incredible three-part analysis explaining the 2020 election steal, The Navarro Report, and Mike Lindell, who co-produced and hosted two documentaries about the 2020 election steal, have all repeatedly stated ‘that if just one of these swing states fall, they’ll all fall like a house of cards.’
So, to prevent ‘this house of cards from falling’ and any election tampering and fraud being exposed, the Democratic hit team blew into Arizona, a top Democrat-run nonprofit at the helm, with three law firms in tow to shut this thing in Arizona down.
The Protect Democracy Project (PDP) nonprofit, which is in reality functioning as a weaponized, political tool of the Democrats, sicced not one, not two, but three law firms on the Arizona Senate’s audit teams: Perkins Coie and two Arizona firms, Coppersmith Brockelman, and Barton Mendez Soto.
Read more:🔗GP
The Gateway Pundit
EXCLUSIVE: The Democrats' Attorney Marc Elias Has His Army of Radical Lawyers Ready to Threaten and Stop Any Election Audit in…
The national Democratic machine is in panic mode over the Arizona Senate’s Maricopa County ballot audit.
Arizona Conservatives Take Action
https://twitter.com/SwainForSenate/status/1379867543024771072?s=20 Maricopa received $3M from Zuckerberg in the 2020 “election”
Arizona Governor Signs Bill Banning Private Donations for Election Processes
❌Zuckerbucks👊‼️
Read more:🔗ET
*use “instant view” if you don’t have an account with ET
❌Zuckerbucks👊‼️
Read more:🔗ET
*use “instant view” if you don’t have an account with ET
The Epoch Times
Arizona Governor Signs Bill Banning Private Donations for Election Processes
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey on Friday signed legislation that prohibits donations for election operations in the state.
🚨Live Antrim, County Michigan Hearing Part 1 Tune-In 📺
Attorney Matthew DePerno and his team published a bombshell response of information on Friday in advance of today's hearing. Tune in live with CannCon as we watch the hearing to grant or deny a motion from the State of Michigan to limit the scope of the investigation.
📺🔗Antrim County Michigan Hearing
Learn more:🔗Interview with Matt DePerno
🇺🇸Support this case: DePernoLaw.com
Attorney Matthew DePerno and his team published a bombshell response of information on Friday in advance of today's hearing. Tune in live with CannCon as we watch the hearing to grant or deny a motion from the State of Michigan to limit the scope of the investigation.
📺🔗Antrim County Michigan Hearing
Learn more:🔗Interview with Matt DePerno
🇺🇸Support this case: DePernoLaw.com
Arizona Election Integrity Update: Location Found for the Audit
Information relayed to UncoverDC by Finchem from the Senate leadership indicates that they have now “secured 20,000+ square footage known as the Coliseum at our state fairgrounds to perform the audit; arrangements for 24-hour physical and live streaming security and the audit teams are assembling and transporting the equipment and personnel to Arizona with an expected start date of the laborious task of ballot-by-ballot inspection and tabulation on April 22nd.”
Read more:🔗Audit Update
Information relayed to UncoverDC by Finchem from the Senate leadership indicates that they have now “secured 20,000+ square footage known as the Coliseum at our state fairgrounds to perform the audit; arrangements for 24-hour physical and live streaming security and the audit teams are assembling and transporting the equipment and personnel to Arizona with an expected start date of the laborious task of ballot-by-ballot inspection and tabulation on April 22nd.”
Read more:🔗Audit Update
Arizona Conservatives Take Action pinned «“A Demented Pervert – Who Can’t Tie His Own Shoelaces or Know Where He Is” – Sidney Powell Goes Off on Imposter President Joe Biden (VIDEO) Sidney Powell: “Just realize they took the two most pathetic candidates in the history of the Democratic Party. A…»
Arizona Conservatives Take Action pinned «Arizona Audit Update from Gail Golec and Liz Harris Venue change for the audit An hour-long video from Gail Golec and Liz Harris revealed that the AZ Senate is currently opting to move the ballots from the Maricopa County Tabulation & Election Center (MTEC)…»
Arizona Conservatives Take Action pinned «Copy of the AZ Senate’s January subpoena to the Board of Supervisors https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cy6uW51Ej4u40di8ojrSWSFrjUSilIFD/view»
Arizona Conservatives Take Action pinned «Copy of the AZ Senate’s December subpoena to the Board of Supervisors https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kjAgHga77UZ-vkPEGJDsTon-z8qGyCSx/view»
Antrim Hearing Part 2 (1:30 ET): The Decision
📺Watch live🔗Michigan Hearing
Learn more:🔗Interview with Matt DePerno
🇺🇸Support this case: DePernoLaw.com
📺Watch live🔗Michigan Hearing
Learn more:🔗Interview with Matt DePerno
🇺🇸Support this case: DePernoLaw.com
Rumble
Part 2 of Antrim County Hearing minus the 4-county Subpoenas - Info in Description
We lost the 4 county subpoena request because the witnesses in the evidence weren't added to the discovery and weren't verified as "expert", however, the Judge did say "at least not yet" and referred
Forwarded from Michigan Conservatives Take Action (Mulbry)
Antrim County hearing update regarding the 1st matter of "Joint Motion for Protective Order"
Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer has DISMISSED the 8 subpoenas to allow further discovery that would be "used as [a] control group" to confirm or deny assertions that the Antrim County election results were manipulated algorithmically.
Per the judge:
"The court finds that the information that the plaintiff (DePerno) seeks is not likely to lead to relevant information for the following reasons:
"The plaintiff has not put forth admissible evidence to show that there would be even a possibility of such recovery. The "experts" that have been identified to support its contentions — Frank, CyberNinja, and Penrose — while having interesting theories, are not expert witnesses that have, as of yet, been named within this court's case management order, and were produced in the waning hours after discovery had closed in this case.
"The plaintiff has not deposed the witnesses who may indeed know about the deleted messages and put them under oath. Discovery [period] is closed."
The motion for approval by the defense (the State) has been granted.
This is not what we were hoping to hear. There are other aspects of this matter still being discussed and the hearing in whole is not finished, merely this initial motion.
Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer has DISMISSED the 8 subpoenas to allow further discovery that would be "used as [a] control group" to confirm or deny assertions that the Antrim County election results were manipulated algorithmically.
Per the judge:
"The court finds that the information that the plaintiff (DePerno) seeks is not likely to lead to relevant information for the following reasons:
"The plaintiff has not put forth admissible evidence to show that there would be even a possibility of such recovery. The "experts" that have been identified to support its contentions — Frank, CyberNinja, and Penrose — while having interesting theories, are not expert witnesses that have, as of yet, been named within this court's case management order, and were produced in the waning hours after discovery had closed in this case.
"The plaintiff has not deposed the witnesses who may indeed know about the deleted messages and put them under oath. Discovery [period] is closed."
The motion for approval by the defense (the State) has been granted.
This is not what we were hoping to hear. There are other aspects of this matter still being discussed and the hearing in whole is not finished, merely this initial motion.
Twitter
Patrick Colbeck✝️
BREAKING NEWS: Despite evidence of wireless modem installations and algorithmic manipulation of election results in other MI counties, Judge Kevin Elsenheimer dismissed subpoenas of 8 MI counties used as control group to validate Antrim County assertions.
Forwarded from Michigan Conservatives Take Action (Mulbry)
Latest update on remaining motions are providing partial wins:
— LOSS: The judge has ruled that the plaintiff has to collect information on a county by county basis and is saying that the Plaintiff will have to win in Antrim County before the plaintiff can go forward with other counties. The judge said he is leaving the parties to work that portion out amongst themselves.
This will make DePerno's work a lot more difficult.
— WIN # 1: More discovery needs to be done with regards to the cell phone. Tabulator tape for Antrim County MUST BE PROVIDED. This is REALLY GOOD. The tabulator tape counts the actual votes and controls the outcome in an audit, it does not rely on what the machines said were votes.
— WIN #2: the judge is requiring the Plaintiff be provided the IP ADDRESSES.
— WIN #3: The clerk has to review and produce any information that happened to be missed initially. Plaintiff is entitled to communication to county and state officials if something was not produced from the initial request and provision. Must be produced within 28 days from this date.
— WIN #4: The judge left the door open to future discovery / investigation in the 8 additional counties, pending Antrim results.
— LOSS: The judge has ruled that the plaintiff has to collect information on a county by county basis and is saying that the Plaintiff will have to win in Antrim County before the plaintiff can go forward with other counties. The judge said he is leaving the parties to work that portion out amongst themselves.
This will make DePerno's work a lot more difficult.
— WIN # 1: More discovery needs to be done with regards to the cell phone. Tabulator tape for Antrim County MUST BE PROVIDED. This is REALLY GOOD. The tabulator tape counts the actual votes and controls the outcome in an audit, it does not rely on what the machines said were votes.
— WIN #2: the judge is requiring the Plaintiff be provided the IP ADDRESSES.
— WIN #3: The clerk has to review and produce any information that happened to be missed initially. Plaintiff is entitled to communication to county and state officials if something was not produced from the initial request and provision. Must be produced within 28 days from this date.
— WIN #4: The judge left the door open to future discovery / investigation in the 8 additional counties, pending Antrim results.
EXCLUSIVE: Voting Machine Systems Should Be Banned from US Elections Until the Highly Suspect “Adjudication Process” Is Defined and Corrected
Voting machine adjudication is a fraud-enablement weapon.
Read more:🔗GP
Michigan:
We first noted this in this audit of Antrim County performed by Deperno. We reported after the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines by a group brought in by attorney Deperno, that the Dominion Voting machines there were assigned a 68.05% error rate. DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine, a whopping 68.05% error rate means that 68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder, and, “The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained. The number of votes going to adjudication should be a fraction of this.
Nevada:
We next found voting machines that were set at around a 70% adjudication rate in Clark County, Nevada.
Georgia:
In Georgia, we noticed that an individual can ‘adjudicate’ a ballot by him or herself and can even push through blank ballots into the system and record them as voting for whomever they want (🔗Coffee County Election Supervisor video) Also, the adjudication system in Dominion provides no data (or audit trail) to show who did the adjudication on a ballot. This weakness needs to be addressed in the voting machine systems.
Arizona:
Senator Townsend said that in Maricopa County there was an 11.27% adjudication rate in the 2020 general election (🔗Maricopa AZ - Townsend, 🔗GP). A normal adjudication rate is less than 2%.
Voting machine adjudication is a fraud-enablement weapon.
Read more:🔗GP
Michigan:
We first noted this in this audit of Antrim County performed by Deperno. We reported after the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines by a group brought in by attorney Deperno, that the Dominion Voting machines there were assigned a 68.05% error rate. DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine, a whopping 68.05% error rate means that 68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder, and, “The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained. The number of votes going to adjudication should be a fraction of this.
Nevada:
We next found voting machines that were set at around a 70% adjudication rate in Clark County, Nevada.
Georgia:
In Georgia, we noticed that an individual can ‘adjudicate’ a ballot by him or herself and can even push through blank ballots into the system and record them as voting for whomever they want (🔗Coffee County Election Supervisor video) Also, the adjudication system in Dominion provides no data (or audit trail) to show who did the adjudication on a ballot. This weakness needs to be addressed in the voting machine systems.
Arizona:
Senator Townsend said that in Maricopa County there was an 11.27% adjudication rate in the 2020 general election (🔗Maricopa AZ - Townsend, 🔗GP). A normal adjudication rate is less than 2%.
The Gateway Pundit
EXCLUSIVE: Voting Machine Systems Should Be Banned from US Elections Until the Highly Suspect "Adjudication Process" Is Defined…
Since the 2020 election the American public learned that voting machines and the systems surrounding the machines have the ability to send ballots to adjudication. So what is ballot adjudication?