Driven by the desire for exotic travel experiences and an increasing reliance on aviation and luxury amenities, affluence has turned tourism into a carbon-inten- sive consumption category. Global demand for tourism is outstrip- ping the decarbonization of tourism operations, and, as a result, is accelerating global carbon emissions. At the same time, at least 15% of global tourism-related emissions are currently under no binding reduction target as emissions of international aviation and bunker shipping are excluded from the Paris Agreement. In addition, the United States, the most significant source of tourism emissions, does not support the Agreement.
From: The carbon footprint of global tourism
From: The carbon footprint of global tourism
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Müssen wir 🐺 jetzt ⚰️, nur weil er Hunger hat? Nein, das ist ja Natur! Lassen wir die Wölfe in Ruhe. Und eventuell kann der 👨🌾 auch die Schafe besser schützen ...
Do we need to kill wolfs, just because they are hungry? Nope at all, this is nature at the end! Farmers could even do much more to protect sheeps in case.
Backup by @AnimalFreaks
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Do we need to kill wolfs, just because they are hungry? Nope at all, this is nature at the end! Farmers could even do much more to protect sheeps in case.
Backup by @AnimalFreaks
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Originally dubbed “surplus killing” (Kruuk 1972), this phenomenon has also been called “excessive killing” (Carbyn 1983). A fine distinction between the terms has been proposed (Miller et al. 1985), but it is arguable whether this distinction has any relevance. In both cases, wolves kill more than they can immediately consume. However, if sufficient time passes without scavengers finishing off the carcasses, wolves do return and feed on what researchers originally regarded as surplus or excessive (Mech et al. 1998, 2001). Banfield (1954, 49) perceived this behavior more than a half-century ago when he wrote that “what may appear to be excessive killing by wolves seldom goes unutilized in the long run.” The fact is that wolves are programmed to kill and eat whenever they can because generally it requires considerable time, energy, and risk most of the time to do so.
More about the topic wolf and the diet of a wolf
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Ein Pullover sollst du sein" – PETA stellt Attitüde der Fashion-Industrie in Video nach
Backup by @AnimalFreaks
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Backup by @AnimalFreaks
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
YouTube, they (active in NL) are killing sheeps for Allah (WTF, an animal cannot fix your diseases! like those people thinking that praying fix issues ... all religious bullshit!) and then we complain about the wolf ... (fully visible in old videos too). Do you find that correctly? Channel is still online and such donations on a dutch account too ... we now have contacted the dutch police to shut their activities off. How "Animal abuse content" rules are not respected by YouTube. This just one of tons of example where YouTube does nothing, but then other YouTubers are saying "if you publish content against their rules, the content get removed" which is just bullshit. There are even copyright videos uploaded 10 years ago, even this would be against their rules to be honest, just another example.