Let we now get back to the topic migration, because we want to be clear!
Again we are not against migration, we are against migration done in illegal way!
We have nothing against 🇹🇷 or 🇸🇦 or whatever, like nothing against ☪️ ... since migrants could be 🇨🇳, 🇦🇺, 🇮🇳, 🇺🇸🇪🇸, 🇿🇦 that has nothing to do with 🕌 at all!
☪️ in Europe is fine too! if human / animal and planet rights of 🇪🇺 are respected too
Second point. We understand perfectly that some refugees really need help! For sure we stand with them, but
a) by doing that in legal way
b) not abusing human rights or laws or whatever, means not doing a legal migration and then doing another illegal migration, just because you are not happy ...
c) by respecting laws and rights in the destination country
d) be ready to leave the country, if the country is saying you NO!
About "The right to seek asylum in another country for those who have lost the protection of their own country, is
enshrined in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Refugee Convention is the first treaty which turned the ideals of the Declaration into
legally binding obligations. It is therefore not a crime to seek asylum, even if the person has entered the country irregularly"
YES THIS IS RIGHT! but doing it illegal SHOULD BE A CRIME!
The problem here is not missing rights because people are dying by jumping from a wall (= they do almost an intentional suicide!) or because they illegally migrate ...
The problem here are:
a) walls that don't respect animal rights!
https://xn--r1a.website/BorderWallEcocide
b) walls that are build with no sense, even related to humans, and are really useless
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/594
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/582
c) missing human rights in all such countries
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/580
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/29
d) criminality done related to the illegal migration, no matter if by countries / brands or migrants
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
e) see next post
Again we are not against migration, we are against migration done in illegal way!
We have nothing against 🇹🇷 or 🇸🇦 or whatever, like nothing against ☪️ ... since migrants could be 🇨🇳, 🇦🇺, 🇮🇳, 🇺🇸🇪🇸, 🇿🇦 that has nothing to do with 🕌 at all!
☪️ in Europe is fine too! if human / animal and planet rights of 🇪🇺 are respected too
Second point. We understand perfectly that some refugees really need help! For sure we stand with them, but
a) by doing that in legal way
b) not abusing human rights or laws or whatever, means not doing a legal migration and then doing another illegal migration, just because you are not happy ...
c) by respecting laws and rights in the destination country
d) be ready to leave the country, if the country is saying you NO!
About "The right to seek asylum in another country for those who have lost the protection of their own country, is
enshrined in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Refugee Convention is the first treaty which turned the ideals of the Declaration into
legally binding obligations. It is therefore not a crime to seek asylum, even if the person has entered the country irregularly"
YES THIS IS RIGHT! but doing it illegal SHOULD BE A CRIME!
The problem here is not missing rights because people are dying by jumping from a wall (= they do almost an intentional suicide!) or because they illegally migrate ...
The problem here are:
a) walls that don't respect animal rights!
https://xn--r1a.website/BorderWallEcocide
b) walls that are build with no sense, even related to humans, and are really useless
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/594
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/582
c) missing human rights in all such countries
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/580
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/29
d) criminality done related to the illegal migration, no matter if by countries / brands or migrants
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
e) see next post
The problem related to illegal migration are:
a-d) see https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
e) United Nations 1967 Refugee Protocol: missing countries
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/559
so doing that should be related TO EVERY COUNTRY, and this should be defined by laws in based on the possibility of the country, how much money such country has, etc.
This means not just some countries do that, other not. All countries should do that, no matter if 🇮🇳, 🇷🇺, 🇨🇳, 🇦🇪, 🇪🇺 or whatever ... and not abuse the fact that a country is rich, means he need to do more than other ....
f) giving a shit when maybe someone is asking that in legal way. Ok to fight illegality, but if one really need help and he does it in legal way, one of 195 countries worldwide should TEMPORARY help him.
Again TEMPORARY! Not that temporary become "forever"!
Once a country recovered from such disaster (means not just wars ...), such country should pay countries who helped back, by helping when other need help or whatever!
So NO ABUSE of human rights is allowed, no matter who is abusing human rights!
So we need to collaborate much better, by removing real missing human rights
If this is not important for us, we would not share even Amnesty posts ... since Amnesty is saying the "opposite" but we believe in such case both have in part right, so countries fighting against illegal migration and refugees, because it's important to check things from many point of views and be neutral as possible, by still consider rights for both ...
Global Refugee Crisis – by the numbers (2015) https://perma.cc/SL6Q-4F2C
As of 10 November 2023, Venezuelan nationals in Peru will no longer be able to apply for temporary protection https://perma.cc/P9L3-5FYD
Global refugee crisis: Catastrophic moral failure as rich countries leave refugees to cruel and uncertain fates (2015) https://perma.cc/S9JV-CDAH
Migrant crisis: Migration to Europe explained in seven charts https://perma.cc/ZKG9-GMEW
More
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/595
a-d) see https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
e) United Nations 1967 Refugee Protocol: missing countries
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/559
so doing that should be related TO EVERY COUNTRY, and this should be defined by laws in based on the possibility of the country, how much money such country has, etc.
This means not just some countries do that, other not. All countries should do that, no matter if 🇮🇳, 🇷🇺, 🇨🇳, 🇦🇪, 🇪🇺 or whatever ... and not abuse the fact that a country is rich, means he need to do more than other ....
f) giving a shit when maybe someone is asking that in legal way. Ok to fight illegality, but if one really need help and he does it in legal way, one of 195 countries worldwide should TEMPORARY help him.
Again TEMPORARY! Not that temporary become "forever"!
Once a country recovered from such disaster (means not just wars ...), such country should pay countries who helped back, by helping when other need help or whatever!
So NO ABUSE of human rights is allowed, no matter who is abusing human rights!
So we need to collaborate much better, by removing real missing human rights
If this is not important for us, we would not share even Amnesty posts ... since Amnesty is saying the "opposite" but we believe in such case both have in part right, so countries fighting against illegal migration and refugees, because it's important to check things from many point of views and be neutral as possible, by still consider rights for both ...
Global Refugee Crisis – by the numbers (2015) https://perma.cc/SL6Q-4F2C
As of 10 November 2023, Venezuelan nationals in Peru will no longer be able to apply for temporary protection https://perma.cc/P9L3-5FYD
Global refugee crisis: Catastrophic moral failure as rich countries leave refugees to cruel and uncertain fates (2015) https://perma.cc/S9JV-CDAH
Migrant crisis: Migration to Europe explained in seven charts https://perma.cc/ZKG9-GMEW
More
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/595
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember / nicht vergessen: this is / das ist Rwanda
So one thing is sure, Rwanda is not the solution for illegal migration!
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/490
We need to change laws, create migration walls, implement controls
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/489
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
and sentence all criminals behind the illegal migration too (means not the migrants ...)
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/488
One thing is sure. We cannot ignore such problem too!
So one thing is sure, Rwanda is not the solution for illegal migration!
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/490
We need to change laws, create migration walls, implement controls
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/489
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28
and sentence all criminals behind the illegal migration too (means not the migrants ...)
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/488
One thing is sure. We cannot ignore such problem too!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌈💩NO to shitty death sentences! 🌈💩
Death penalty only with 🧠
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ
https://xn--r1a.website/AmnestyShit
https://xn--r1a.website/AmnestyBullshit
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceNOW
https://xn--r1a.website/ShittyDeathSentences
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence
https://xn--r1a.website/SerialKillerDeathSentence
https://xn--r1a.website/DahmerDeathSentence
https://xn--r1a.website/TedBundyTelegram
https://xn--r1a.website/RecidivismFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/CrimeExamples
https://xn--r1a.website/ParoleFacts
and without 🔥 🔫 🪢 🗡 🪨 🛢💧💨🔪🐍⚡️🥊🗜🪤🏑🏹 as method, ONLY 💉
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceNOW
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathExecutionMethod
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Illegal migrants are NOT criminal????!!!!!
Illegal migration IS a CRIME!
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/42
and should be sentenced as a criminal!
It's time to stop this no sense law "we cannot bring them back" if they do illegal migration.
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/481
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/422
Again, the goal is not doing that in Rwanda style, because this is another crime
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/491
exactly like building walls without considering animal rights
https://xn--r1a.website/BorderWallEcocide
It's time to stop abusing human rights, because our governments wrote no sense definitions of human rights
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
without even considering the deep and type of crimes etc. exactly like they wrote mostly bad laws in general.
a bit like this no sense law "Wer ein fremdes nichtöffentliches Gespräch, ohne die Einwilligung aller daran Beteiligten, mit einem Abhörgerät abhört oder auf einen Tonträger aufnimmt: Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren"
"Wer als Gesprächsteilnehmer ein nichtöffentliches Gespräch, ohne die Einwilligung der andern daran Beteiligten, auf einen Tonträger aufnimmt: Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr" https://perma.cc/YXS4-JAJP
When in reality IT DEPENDS A LOT:
- are you recording that to show a crime or whatever?! 🙅♂️ prison
- are you doing the same, but at the end they haven't said what you wished they would say? 🙅♂️ prison, if you delete / don't share such audio
- are you spying people? ✅
- goal is just to share such things to the public? ✅
What they are doing in this video is pretty similar to spying people, near doing illegal migration, abusing illegal of transport, etc.
Wer gegen den Willen des Berechtigten in ein Haus, in eine Wohnung, in einen abgeschlossenen Raum eines Hauses oder in einen unmittelbar zu einem Hause gehörenden umfriedeten Platz, Hof oder Garten oder in einen Werkplatz unrechtmässig eindringt ... drei Jahren https://perma.cc/YXS4-JAJP
Means at least 3 years of prison!
Illegal migration IS a CRIME!
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/42
and should be sentenced as a criminal!
It's time to stop this no sense law "we cannot bring them back" if they do illegal migration.
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/481
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/422
Again, the goal is not doing that in Rwanda style, because this is another crime
https://xn--r1a.website/MigrationTelegram/491
exactly like building walls without considering animal rights
https://xn--r1a.website/BorderWallEcocide
It's time to stop abusing human rights, because our governments wrote no sense definitions of human rights
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
without even considering the deep and type of crimes etc. exactly like they wrote mostly bad laws in general.
a bit like this no sense law "Wer ein fremdes nichtöffentliches Gespräch, ohne die Einwilligung aller daran Beteiligten, mit einem Abhörgerät abhört oder auf einen Tonträger aufnimmt: Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren"
"Wer als Gesprächsteilnehmer ein nichtöffentliches Gespräch, ohne die Einwilligung der andern daran Beteiligten, auf einen Tonträger aufnimmt: Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr" https://perma.cc/YXS4-JAJP
When in reality IT DEPENDS A LOT:
- are you recording that to show a crime or whatever?! 🙅♂️ prison
- are you doing the same, but at the end they haven't said what you wished they would say? 🙅♂️ prison, if you delete / don't share such audio
- are you spying people? ✅
- goal is just to share such things to the public? ✅
What they are doing in this video is pretty similar to spying people, near doing illegal migration, abusing illegal of transport, etc.
Wer gegen den Willen des Berechtigten in ein Haus, in eine Wohnung, in einen abgeschlossenen Raum eines Hauses oder in einen unmittelbar zu einem Hause gehörenden umfriedeten Platz, Hof oder Garten oder in einen Werkplatz unrechtmässig eindringt ... drei Jahren https://perma.cc/YXS4-JAJP
Means at least 3 years of prison!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Some point about such video and similar videos (part 1)
a) how much fake they are? ... TikTok is well know for fake and bullshit things ... where the only thing that matter is JUST TO MAKE VIEWS AND FOLLOWERS! which is NOT the case of other social networks ...
b) DO YOU HAVE THE PERMISSION TO RECORD OTHER PEOPLE?
Remember that THIS IS A CRIME! In case the video is real.
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/771
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/497
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/419
Eine Persönlichkeitsverletzung nur dann mit Sicherheit ausgeschlossen werden, wenn die abgelichteten Personen nicht identifizierbar sind, also wenn ein Gruppenbild z.B. nur kleinformatig abgedruckt oder die Auflösung derart herabgesetzt wird, dass keine Gesichter oder andere identifizierenden Merkmale mehr auszumachen sind https://perma.cc/PP34-FDZZ
Wenn kein anderer Rechtfertigungsgrund vorliegt, muss die Einwilligung der abgebildeten Personen eingeholt werden.
Video-Aufnahmen dürfen nur veröffentlicht werden, wenn die abgebildeten Personen vorgängig eingewilligt haben https://perma.cc/DW83-LBN2
Artikel 31 des Datenschutzgesetzes (DSG): er besagt, dass eine Persönlichkeitsverletzung widerrechtlich ist, wenn sie nicht durch die Einwilligung der betroffenen Person, durch ein überwiegendes privates oder öffentliches Interesse oder durch Gesetz gerechtfertigt ist https://perma.cc/BF62-5DUS
c) if people react in strange way to Hijab (or more covered version) it's pretty fine! Even if we allow that, doesn't mean we agree with that! or such culture ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
to
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
d) related to c, they showed a not really Hijab version ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
So similar to Niqab (we are not expert of Islam dressing ... so maybe they call it in other ways ....)
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
e) there is nothing special on the video. Girls are nothing special. How they are dressed is nothing special
a) how much fake they are? ... TikTok is well know for fake and bullshit things ... where the only thing that matter is JUST TO MAKE VIEWS AND FOLLOWERS! which is NOT the case of other social networks ...
b) DO YOU HAVE THE PERMISSION TO RECORD OTHER PEOPLE?
Remember that THIS IS A CRIME! In case the video is real.
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/771
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/497
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/419
Eine Persönlichkeitsverletzung nur dann mit Sicherheit ausgeschlossen werden, wenn die abgelichteten Personen nicht identifizierbar sind, also wenn ein Gruppenbild z.B. nur kleinformatig abgedruckt oder die Auflösung derart herabgesetzt wird, dass keine Gesichter oder andere identifizierenden Merkmale mehr auszumachen sind https://perma.cc/PP34-FDZZ
Wenn kein anderer Rechtfertigungsgrund vorliegt, muss die Einwilligung der abgebildeten Personen eingeholt werden.
Video-Aufnahmen dürfen nur veröffentlicht werden, wenn die abgebildeten Personen vorgängig eingewilligt haben https://perma.cc/DW83-LBN2
Artikel 31 des Datenschutzgesetzes (DSG): er besagt, dass eine Persönlichkeitsverletzung widerrechtlich ist, wenn sie nicht durch die Einwilligung der betroffenen Person, durch ein überwiegendes privates oder öffentliches Interesse oder durch Gesetz gerechtfertigt ist https://perma.cc/BF62-5DUS
c) if people react in strange way to Hijab (or more covered version) it's pretty fine! Even if we allow that, doesn't mean we agree with that! or such culture ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
to
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
d) related to c, they showed a not really Hijab version ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
So similar to Niqab (we are not expert of Islam dressing ... so maybe they call it in other ways ....)
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
e) there is nothing special on the video. Girls are nothing special. How they are dressed is nothing special
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Some point about such video and similar videos (part 2)
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/1414
f) France, Switzerland and all other countries HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST TO REMOVE FACE COVER! Like dressing as an hooligan is NOT OK, even other type of dressing are NOT OK. This not to say that 🕌 is terrorist! or to discriminate ☪️
https://xn--r1a.website/MuslimTerrorists
but because you know NOTHING behind such person. Maybe she is not even a girl (we don't mean trans women), but just a man trying to cover ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
to
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
Again, crimes can be done even by people dressed in Alan Walker style, so is not related to 🕌!
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/564
So, all people need to be controlled
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarRights/1127
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/38
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/564
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/665
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/50
NO EXCEPTION!
and this mean even ☪️ people.
Hijab is not a crime, BURKA INSTEAD IN PART YES! not because of being 🕌, but because BURKA is pretty similar to be hooligans! and we don't allow and support hooligans dress in our countries.
So even if burka is not banned, but police ask to show the face, there is NO REASON to reject that, because police has the full right to know who is behind a BURKA or a hooligan dress ...
If you want to live in our countries, you need to adapt to our laws our culture, otherwise you can remain in Arabia! If we come to Arabia, we need to adapt us too! So start to respect our laws! This especially related to illegal migrants that do what they want on our countries ...
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
If you don't respect laws, countries have full right to expel you
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/272
Again, you can follow a religion BUT YOU CANNOT FOLLOW PRINCIPES AGAINST HUMAN / ANIMAL / PLANET RIGHT OR PROMOTING CRIMES and act like "they discriminate me"!
NO AND NO! Such things against right in our countries should be banned per default!
https://xn--r1a.website/ReligionBullshit
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/1414
f) France, Switzerland and all other countries HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST TO REMOVE FACE COVER! Like dressing as an hooligan is NOT OK, even other type of dressing are NOT OK. This not to say that 🕌 is terrorist! or to discriminate ☪️
https://xn--r1a.website/MuslimTerrorists
but because you know NOTHING behind such person. Maybe she is not even a girl (we don't mean trans women), but just a man trying to cover ...
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/571
to
https://xn--r1a.website/WomenRightsTelegram/580
Again, crimes can be done even by people dressed in Alan Walker style, so is not related to 🕌!
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/564
So, all people need to be controlled
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarRights/1127
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/38
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/564
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/665
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/50
NO EXCEPTION!
and this mean even ☪️ people.
Hijab is not a crime, BURKA INSTEAD IN PART YES! not because of being 🕌, but because BURKA is pretty similar to be hooligans! and we don't allow and support hooligans dress in our countries.
So even if burka is not banned, but police ask to show the face, there is NO REASON to reject that, because police has the full right to know who is behind a BURKA or a hooligan dress ...
If you want to live in our countries, you need to adapt to our laws our culture, otherwise you can remain in Arabia! If we come to Arabia, we need to adapt us too! So start to respect our laws! This especially related to illegal migrants that do what they want on our countries ...
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
If you don't respect laws, countries have full right to expel you
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/272
Again, you can follow a religion BUT YOU CANNOT FOLLOW PRINCIPES AGAINST HUMAN / ANIMAL / PLANET RIGHT OR PROMOTING CRIMES and act like "they discriminate me"!
NO AND NO! Such things against right in our countries should be banned per default!
https://xn--r1a.website/ReligionBullshit
A Clear Scientific Consensus that the Death Penalty does NOT Deter https://perma.cc/XY4W-WFEE
Well, let we check the other points.
In fact, the authors report that 88.2% of respondents do not think that the death penalty deters murder—a level of consensus comparable to the agreement among scientists regarding global climate changeopens in a new tab —> "penalty deters murder" IT'S NOT ONLY ABOUT THAT! Just you know, the paper has been published in 2009 founded by Tides, an organization AGAINST DEATH SENTENCE, so it's not A NEUTRAL PAPER! https://perma.cc/D6JW-B9BS
Tides also launched the Tides Death Penalty Mobilization Fund, which supports the anti-death penalty movement https://perma.cc/4A4L-E47K
We instead share both pro and contra of death sentence, because this is how scientific research is done, looking both part and we don't say "death sentence is gold standard!"
Like we said, Amnesty acts like some vegans, that just check facts with half of the informations! and they still don't defend all type of human and animal rights too! Just a shame.
Seems like vegans using just a bullshit position paper
https://xn--r1a.website/Vegan_Nutrition_Alimentazione/136
Now we haven't checked the full paper, but you can read a summary here https://perma.cc/8X4Y-HZM2. A new recent review was published in 2022, where they report the same Canada bullshit like Amnesty (see our picture). Plus remember it's not just about USA or homicides, new lethal methods are available, etc.
Other things just to share that
The study, conducted in 2018, found that 76 per cent of respondents believed that the death penalty is more effective than life imprisonment in discouraging people from committing serious crimes in Singapore, such as murder, smuggling of firearms and drug trafficking https://perma.cc/Q8C4-8U5A but "Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) conducted or commissioned" ... WTF .. https://perma.cc/G8MA-MUZL
Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime? https://perma.cc/YA9J-APGH
Well, let we check the other points.
In fact, the authors report that 88.2% of respondents do not think that the death penalty deters murder—a level of consensus comparable to the agreement among scientists regarding global climate changeopens in a new tab —> "penalty deters murder" IT'S NOT ONLY ABOUT THAT! Just you know, the paper has been published in 2009 founded by Tides, an organization AGAINST DEATH SENTENCE, so it's not A NEUTRAL PAPER! https://perma.cc/D6JW-B9BS
Tides also launched the Tides Death Penalty Mobilization Fund, which supports the anti-death penalty movement https://perma.cc/4A4L-E47K
We instead share both pro and contra of death sentence, because this is how scientific research is done, looking both part and we don't say "death sentence is gold standard!"
Like we said, Amnesty acts like some vegans, that just check facts with half of the informations! and they still don't defend all type of human and animal rights too! Just a shame.
Seems like vegans using just a bullshit position paper
https://xn--r1a.website/Vegan_Nutrition_Alimentazione/136
Now we haven't checked the full paper, but you can read a summary here https://perma.cc/8X4Y-HZM2. A new recent review was published in 2022, where they report the same Canada bullshit like Amnesty (see our picture). Plus remember it's not just about USA or homicides, new lethal methods are available, etc.
Other things just to share that
The study, conducted in 2018, found that 76 per cent of respondents believed that the death penalty is more effective than life imprisonment in discouraging people from committing serious crimes in Singapore, such as murder, smuggling of firearms and drug trafficking https://perma.cc/Q8C4-8U5A but "Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) conducted or commissioned" ... WTF .. https://perma.cc/G8MA-MUZL
Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime? https://perma.cc/YA9J-APGH